Posted on 12/16/2014 12:42:15 PM PST by wagglebee
A vote December 2 by the Washington, D.C., City Council could compel private religious schools and universities in the nation’s capital to allow groups that oppose the schools’ moral values access to their campuses, programs, and funds.
The council voted to eliminate faith-based schools’ 25-year-old legal protections from discrimination lawsuits as part of a “human rights amendment.” Barring an act of Congress, D.C.’s religious schools will likely have to go against their religious values when it comes to permitting use to their campuses or programs.
The city’s rules hold that it’s “unlawful discriminatory practice” to limit any use of facilities, services, or programs based on “sexual orientation, gender identity or expression.” With the religious exemption, Washington D.C. religious schools had been able to restrict finances, amenities and approval from individuals and groups “organized for, or engaged in, promoting, encouraging, or condoning any homosexual act, lifestyle, orientation, or belief.”
Lawrence J. Morris, general counsel for the Catholic University of America, told LifeSiteNews the university does not anticipate making any policy changes because of the city council’s action, and is communicating with the city to advocate for religious freedom before the act becomes law.
“We are continuing to engage with the City on the matter and hope that the Mayor takes seriously his opportunity to send a message in support of religious freedom by vetoing the measure when it reaches his desk,” Morris said.
The provision at hand, The Nation’s Capital Religious Liberty and Academic Freedom Act, was written 25 years ago as result of Georgetown University’s refusal to recognize a pro-homosexual student group. It was put in place as part of a federal appropriations bill to protect religiously-affiliated schools or those “closely associated with the tenets of a religious organization.”
The city council passed the “Human Rights Amendment of 2014” on December 2, and Congress has 30 days to annul the action.
Michael Scott, director of the District of Columbia Catholic Conference, had given a written statement in October to the city council in favor of the exemption, telling the council its repeal would be an “unjustifiable violation of these schools’ rights to advance their sincerely-held religious beliefs regarding human sexuality.”
“The [Human Rights] Act disregards one of our nation’s first and most cherished freedoms, the right to exercise religion free from government interference,” Scott said.
Scott also indicated at the time that it remains to be seen whether the exemption’s repeal would, in addition to schools, also negatively affect seminaries or other religious educational programs.
Morris told LifeSiteNews if the new law repealing the religious exemption does go into effect, it would have to be read with respect for the First Amendment, “which permits us to operate our religious university in accordance with our deeply held religious beliefs.”
The university doesn’t expect to initiate a suit on the exemption, Morris said, but if it ends up in court he said the university would defend its rights and raise the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
When POTUS repeatedly breaks the law, the law is rendered meaningless.
Soon it will be illegal to not be a homo.
People really do need to start learning the difference between the two Constitutions - of The People, and of the corporations.
It really, really is time.
Always reminds me of Genesis 19. Pushy bunch.
It will end when we get together and say “no”.
And mean it.
With whatever actions it requires.
And dat’s the twuth!
Remember It’s a Bug’s Life.
There are more of US than them.
Many many more.
you don’t get no religious freedom!
Once again we see that perversion trumps religious freedom.
DC city council apparently has never heard of the 1st amendment....
If you want your heterosexuality you can keep your heterosexuality,
Bring them out here that we may know them.
Current members[edit]
Each of the district’s 8 wards elects 1 member of the council, and 5 members, including the chairman, are elected at large
Name Position Party Took office/ Up for reelection
Phil Mendelson Chairman Democratic 2012 2014
David Grosso At-large Independent 2013 2016
David Catania At-large Independent 1997 2014
Anita Bonds At-large Democratic 2012 2014
Vincent Orange At-large Democratic 2011 2016
Jim Graham Ward 1 Democratic 1999 2014
Jack Evans Ward 2 Democratic 1991 2016
Mary Cheh Ward 3 Democratic 2007 2014
Muriel Bowser Ward 4 Democratic 2007 2016
Kenyan McDuffie Ward 5 Democratic 2012 2014
Tommy Wells Ward 6 Democratic 2007 2014
Yvette Alexander Ward 7 Democratic 2007 2016
Vacant Ward 8 2016
Source: Wikipedia
Yes exactly.
(1) Coalition means, blacks, Asians, Mexicans, gays, non-Christians and weird "women" of dubious gender
If only the homosexual lobby knew of the history that exists between communists and themselves, they would realize that they are being used as the easiest means of destroying the USA. Once that has been accomplished, homosexuals will be discarded and ignored at best, or persecuted as never before at its worst.
http://distributedrepublic.net/archives/2006/05/01/the-treatment-of-homosexuals-under-communism/
Two issues going here:1. First and foremost in the minds of queers is access to young children—this is the big lesson learned by the Catholic Church when homos infiltrated the priesthood. 2. Is, money for corrupt lawyers and judges, many of which are queers too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.