Posted on 12/16/2014 9:14:55 AM PST by Impala64ssa
Who knows? By the way, where did "kill me" or "burn me" come from and why would you even mention those words? Hopefully ya get my drift........
I get it. I'm asking in the context of when he made this statement, two weeks after the fact, in an interview where he's claiming his innocence. It had been released early on that she was burned to death, and that something flammable had also apparently been poured into her throat when she was killed.
So, we as readers know she's dead, and, for the most part, that she died due to massive burns, and that she was in a coma before dying. We also read reports that something was poured down her throat that was flammable. He knows this, too. So, instead of asking the anonymous posters, who are taunting him about revenge, about being killed or burned, his specific question to them in response was about someone pouring gasoline down his throat. That's what I'm getting at. Why that specific line of reasoning, rather than just asking about being killed, or even burned? Why did he key on that?
Applying only speculation here, I would offer that he, just as I would, would naturally assume that gasoline was used...........I've already aired my reasoning why "lighter fluid" could not have been used and the source that first mentioned it.
I wasn't keying so much on the gasoline part, as I was the manner of "revenge". Why did he key on someone pouring something (anything) down his throat? Why not respond to the hecklers with something less specific? It just seemed he keyed on a very specific action, rather than a general action, in his question to the hecklers.
Why, why, why.....I have no idea, your guess is as good as mine and both are merely speculations.
Stop. You’re spewing nonsense. There certainly is at least one pic of him throwing gang sign, posing with others doing the same, and there’s ample suspicious things like the manipulated and missing CCTV tape. All that is being done by those of us on the trail is to merely ask questions and point out shady aspects.
Furthermore, The Conservative Treehouse not only nailed virtually every single aspect of both the George Zimmerman and Darren Wilson cases and blew the media and LE out of the water, Zimmerman’s defense lawyers quickly got wise and actually had TCT feeding them the analysis they needed to acquit their client. Get with the program, FRiend.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.