Not really.
A new, conservative party has to recognize the enemy - Rockefeller Republicans - but also has to find new friends.
"Reagan Democrats" are not the solution, because most of them have died. But an analogous group of people DOES exist - working class and lower middle class whites who either don't vote (because there's nobody to vote for that won't hurt them) or who vote for the Democrat because the Republican candidate just sold his business and put them out of work.
A new majority will not emerge until its conservative element accepts the need to give Goldman Sachs and Bank of America a good screwing, to restore the powers of Congress over money, and to protect American workers BECAUSE THEY ARE AMERICANS.
Fauxcahontas is stealing this issue, which I believe is THE winning issue for 2016, and running the husband of a Goldman Sachs managing director against her is a bad plan, however many good speeches he gives.
I wouldn’t sweat the communist retard squaw from Massachusetts.
She has no connection to any constituencies save the communist retard one
I believe the apparent conflict of interest actually gives him an inside edge on that issue.
I believe he would be more apt to be able to explain the extent of regulation congress should have over the banking system.
He would wipe the floor with Fauxcahontas in any debate, let alone on any
congressional regulation powers topic.
Here is an AOL story on the Cruz actions and Reid reactions. Has over 1,000 comments many strongly pro orcon.
http://www.aol.com/article/2014/12/15/republicans-blame-cruz-for-year-end-confirmations/21116657/?cps=gravity