Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Over 1,000 Gun Owners Violate Washington’s I-594 - In Front Of Police!
Townhall.com ^ | December 15, 2014 | Rachel Alexander

Posted on 12/15/2014 10:45:19 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: tgusa

The passage of 594 was pretty much a Seattle/King County thing, just like homo marriage. East of the mountains, particularly, the rural counties want nothing to do with this stuff.


21 posted on 12/15/2014 11:01:57 AM PST by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc OÂ’Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
You can’t even let a friend hold your gun ... it’s considered a transfer under the initiative...

Yep. That's the sneaky part of the bill - "transfer" used to mean permanent ownership, not temporary physical possession. I could call the anti-gunners liars and cheats but it would only be redundant.

22 posted on 12/15/2014 11:03:01 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Cool, how about a monthly gun show at the capital of Washington state?


23 posted on 12/15/2014 11:03:14 AM PST by right way right (America will reject the suck of Socialist Freedumb, one way or another.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fella

That would happen in NY or CT, not here.


24 posted on 12/15/2014 11:03:40 AM PST by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc OÂ’Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 7thson; Kaslin

It is.
Obama and his ego can’t let this stand.


25 posted on 12/15/2014 11:06:52 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mrmeyer

More like.


26 posted on 12/15/2014 11:07:39 AM PST by right way right (America will reject the suck of Socialist Freedumb, one way or another.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

” No one was hurt and no stores were looted. Between 1,000 and 3,000 lawful gun owners showed up———”

No looting?

White privilege again. :-)

.


27 posted on 12/15/2014 11:09:54 AM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve86; Starstruck

OK...I know I should have said “all modern handguns” rather than “all guns.” But all modern handguns still require a background check, correct? The Brady Act and all that....

Frankly, I haven’t bought a gun since the 90’s....it’s all I can do to keep the ones I’ve got clean.... ;-)


28 posted on 12/15/2014 11:10:48 AM PST by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“...........A handful of billionaires and elitists in blue cities like Seattle do not respect the Constitution nor represent the vast majority of Americans.............”

Same billionaires behind Obama trashing the rest of the Constitution as well. Them, and the huge International Corporations with no allegiance to this country, only to what they can extract monetarily from this country for their bottom line, their power, and their luxurious lifestyles.


29 posted on 12/15/2014 11:11:01 AM PST by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeDetweiler

Another scenario: If you’re out hunting and you lay your rifle against a tree to get over some obstacle and it slides to the ground your friend would be unable to pick it up and hand it to you. That would be considered a transfer under this .....


30 posted on 12/15/2014 11:12:26 AM PST by SkyDancer (I Was Told Nobody Is Perfect But Yet, Here I Am)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JoeDetweiler
I thought all gun transfers (except father to son) required a background check as a result of Federal laws.

This is what I was told by a lawyer: Vertical transfers (father to son, daughter to grandma, etc.) are allowed. But horizontal transfers (son to nephew, etc.) are not.

It says a lot about federal law that there is so much murkiness here.

31 posted on 12/15/2014 11:12:50 AM PST by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 7thson

They’re going to wish they had worn masks.


32 posted on 12/15/2014 11:13:10 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: steve86

“Private transfers and most gun show transfers did not require a background check prior to this new law in WA State.”

And that would be a violation of federal law.

FFL transfers at a gun show or a shop go through the background check. If the gun is in their logs, they better have a corresponding 4473 with the approval code from the NICS check.

Private transfers at a gun show, outside in the parking lot, or wherever, do not require a background check because it is just that, a private transfer. A non-FFl caught buying and selling guns as a business can be charged.


33 posted on 12/15/2014 11:13:37 AM PST by Azeem (There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury and ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Just shared on FB. So glad there are Americans standing for their just rights out there!


34 posted on 12/15/2014 11:16:32 AM PST by vpintheak (Keep calm and Rain Steel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Remember, the First Revolution started over gun control ...


35 posted on 12/15/2014 11:16:44 AM PST by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeDetweiler

No if you buy them through a licensed dealer a background check is required but if you sell or give them away yourself none is required under Federal Law. You are probably going to be in trouble if you sell or give one to someone you know to be a felon.


36 posted on 12/15/2014 11:17:08 AM PST by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JoeDetweiler

Per Federal Law: any interstate transfer (with few exceptions) must go through a FFL. Any sale by an FFL must be accompanied by a 4477. Private sales/transfers are not regulated by Federal law.

The Washington law was intrastate and was over and above the Federal statute, further regulating the transfer of firearms within the state.


37 posted on 12/15/2014 11:17:22 AM PST by Herzo61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

Great to see! So violating the new law is a felony?

I would take issue with the assertion that “most law enforcement is pro-gun”.

When the Alabama legislature recently passed a law making it O.K to carry weapons on private property as long as the weapon was locked up, Sheriffs association as well as the usual anti-gunners were forcefully against it. Said there “would be blood in the streets”. Didn’t happen, of course.

I’ve pretty much come to the conclusion that I don’t trust a damn thing law enforcement tells me. Distrust and then verify.


38 posted on 12/15/2014 11:18:16 AM PST by saleman (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Yup,,,

“will not comply”

Good on Ya, left coast !


39 posted on 12/15/2014 11:20:05 AM PST by Big Red Badger ( - William Diamonds Drum - can You Hear it G man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck

OK....it must be a California requirement....we’ve almost reached the guns are illegal stage, they’re working on it...sigh


40 posted on 12/15/2014 11:20:34 AM PST by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson