Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NLRB issues rule to speed up union organizing
Associated Press ^ | Dec 12, 2014 11:25 AM EST | Tom Raum

Posted on 12/12/2014 8:34:08 AM PST by Olog-hai

The National Labor Relations Board issued a final rule on Friday aimed at modernizing and streamlining the union election process.

The new rule will shorten the time between when an election is ordered and the election is held, eliminating a previous 25-day waiting period. And it seeks to reduce litigation that can be used to stall elections. It will also require employers to furnish union organizers with email addresses and phone numbers of workers. […]

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said the NLRB’s “modest but important reforms” will help reduce delays and make it easier for workers to vote on forming a union. …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: nlrb; unionorganizing; unions; unionthugs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Give workers’ phone numbers and email addresses to union organizers? The NLRB is sanctioning what it is supposed to be punishing—unfair labor practices—by opening the door to harassment of workers by unions.
1 posted on 12/12/2014 8:34:08 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Card Check by the back door. You knew this was coming. If the Dems don’t do something they’ll be splitting off to form their own Labo(u)r Party soon.


2 posted on 12/12/2014 8:37:03 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Unions are dying. I guess they need all the help they can get.

I’d be mighty pissed off if I worked in a non-union shop and some NLRB goon gave my email address to the union.


3 posted on 12/12/2014 8:38:53 AM PST by upchuck (Ferguson: Put your hands down and go to work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The Obama Administration has to do what it can to ‘make up’ with Big Labor, and this is a oft wished-for goal of theirs. Since the Labor Unions could not squeeze through ‘Card Check’, this is the next best thing. It will be interesting to see if this passes legal challenge which is bound to come.

I, as a private individual, work at a place that a union wishes to organize. I have a legal right to choose to participate with the union but EQUALLY I have the corresponding right to not participate. If I choose the latter, can the NLRB, as an arm of the Federal Government, violate my 4th Amendment rights to be secure in my person and home (privacy!)


4 posted on 12/12/2014 8:44:42 AM PST by SES1066 (Quality, Speed or Economical - Any 2 of 3 except in government - 1 at best but never #3!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Perhaps a few lawsuits would be in order on the commencement of this practice.


5 posted on 12/12/2014 8:46:13 AM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

people are being moved to self directing 401k’s

unions want to control pensions.

no pension no union.

self determination no union.

The turnover of addresses is to give them to the union politicians.


6 posted on 12/12/2014 8:46:29 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
If the employees' mail address and phone numbers were provided on an opt-in basis, I would be far, far happier. My mailbox is full of so much crud now that a union-forming campaign would just stuff the mailbox even more than it is now. (I hate election season for this reason -- and the US Post Office turns a deaf ear to complaints that "my mailbox is too small for the traffic", with their answer being "well, just empty your mailbox every single day and toss what you don't want." Right.)

Of course, that is exactly what the unions don't want. They want unfettered access. And all that "unfettered" implies.

7 posted on 12/12/2014 8:47:46 AM PST by asinclair (Political hot air is a renewable energy resource)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

If there ever is an article V constitutional convention one of the amendment must be that any rule proposed by a federal agency must be approved by Congress.

Legislation by bureaucrats must end.


8 posted on 12/12/2014 8:52:30 AM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Give dummy addresses and phone numbers...............


9 posted on 12/12/2014 8:55:33 AM PST by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aquila48

Either that or the unconstitutionality of such unaccountable federal agencies (which are part of FDR’s assault on the Constitution, FTR) is codified.


10 posted on 12/12/2014 8:58:58 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

While I do agree that far too many Republicans seem to be RINO’s, this is a good illustration of why even a RINO like Romney would have been MILES ahead of Obummer, in my opinion. Sigh....


11 posted on 12/12/2014 9:01:16 AM PST by JustTheTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustTheTruth

You think Romney would have stopped this?


12 posted on 12/12/2014 9:23:22 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
"We held an election yesterday. You didn't hear about it? Sorry, that's the breaks."
13 posted on 12/12/2014 9:32:27 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Any energy source that requires a subsidy is, by definition, "unsustainable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
You think Romney would have stopped this?

Actually, I do.

However, I doubt that Romney would have done much to Obama-care except change its nickname--to RomneyCare.

14 posted on 12/12/2014 9:51:57 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

How would Romney have stopped the NLRB from doing this? never mind why?


15 posted on 12/12/2014 10:03:29 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Abolish the NLRB.

Stop backdoor card check.


16 posted on 12/12/2014 11:09:12 AM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

He probably wouldn’t have nominated a union goon to head the NLRB; someone that at least understand how franchises work.


17 posted on 12/12/2014 11:10:21 AM PST by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Reducing that 25 day waiting period, makes it a lot harder for businesses to make their case to their employees.

It takes time to develop a clear and concise policy, and present it to employees so they can understand why joining the union might not be the great idea they thought it would be.

Once the presentation is made, the employees need a cooling off period to weigh the issues and make a determination for themselves.

This will make it easy for unions to railroad businesses.

I don’t think this is reasoned at all. Neither do they. They just want unions to flourish, and that’s all that matters.


18 posted on 12/12/2014 11:15:05 AM PST by DoughtyOne (GOP. GOPe. GOPeGads! GOPeWWWWWWWWWWWWW...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I have a family member who is a nurse. The Purple People Beaters are working double-overtime to try and organize her hospital. She has already had to shoo them away from her door several times. This is just going to make her life an absolute living hell.


19 posted on 12/12/2014 12:01:33 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

The UAW has a lot of nurses on their roster.
I suspect at some point in the future there will be more nurses than auto workers.


20 posted on 12/12/2014 12:02:48 PM PST by nascarnation (Impeach, Convict, Deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson