Yeah. How can someone who says Jeb is a loser not see how A=B=C ... Jeb=Krispy=Mitty ... geesh!
Posted on 12/08/2014 8:12:54 AM PST by Servant of the Cross
There is no possibility that Hillary will be the nominee, so it’s OK to stop worrying about losing to HER.
Some times I wonder.
If WE have anything to say about it, then no.
Unless her husband gets a wave of public shame for rape like Cosby, she is going to win. She has a 5% advantage out of the gate from the press and another 5% from vote fraud and illegal aliens, who will vote for her with no fear of being punished.
And the author only leaves some logical reason behind his assertion for ONE potential candidate. What a roller coaster of an article. Ultimately, he bounced his own balls of his forhead as he attempted to stick his head up his a$$ at the end. Couldn't even finish the job.
/johnny
If it’s hillary vs jeb (or Christie or Ryan etc ad nauseum) the puppet masters have already won.
You well could be correct. So now we not only have to “worry” about losing, we have to “worry” over who we will lose to this time.
I agree with your statement, unless for some unknown reason the Chicago Mob decides to endorse the Clinton Crime Family.
Yeah. How can someone who says Jeb is a loser not see how A=B=C ... Jeb=Krispy=Mitty ... geesh!
Only a party that is out of touch to the extreme would nominate an individual whose political viability expired circa 2000. Jeb does have some redeeming value but is largely a mixed bag and represents a dynasty that did more to destroy the achievements of Reagan and set the stage for Obama than any other. I do believe Jeb opposed TARP though it didn’t stop him from endorsing the lost cause campaign of the TARP administrator for CA governor. I’m personally tired of people who don’t seem to know what party they are in and say stupid crap like Illegal immigration is an “Act of love”. Electing people like that hurt us more than losing sometimes.
Several Republican candidates might be able to win in some circumstances, but the only candidate certain to win is Ted Cruz.
The problem, however, is the GOPe would rather Hilary win than an authentic conservative like Ted Cruz. So, they are going to do everything they can to sandbag his candidacy.
Jeb needs to join the Dems and moderate them.
Jeb needs to switch parties and run against Hillary.
Remember though that she has to win the D nomination first.
And in 2008 nobody was thinking a guy from Kenya named Hussein could be elected POTUS.
I think Hillary only gets the nom if the Chicago Mob agrees to stand down. If they decide to run Baraq 2.0 (Warren, Castro, etc) I think the hard lefties in the party ditch her again.
The Stupid Party. A well-earned moniker if there ever was one.
It could also be called the White Flag Party. They are always willing to cave in without a fight.
Well he could be a good Dem VP possibility...but NJFatboy would be better for them!
If you have not figured it out already the left has been picking our designated losers for years. The polls show Jed Bush near the bottom of picks yet he is near the top of the news. That is not by chance, the left pushes the very people who they think are either going to lose or give them what they want if he should somehow win.
agree with all of that....
Sorry but Hillary is a horrible candidate, nothings changed between now and 2008, other than she’s 8 years older. I am no fan of Jeb, but Hillary is a turd, there is and never will be a cult of personality around her.
8 years of horrible democratic rule will make any D nearly impossible to win, but I do hope the R’s put up someone better than Jeb.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.