Nope. you are lying, and bald-faced at that. Cosby is RENOWNED for his get-off-ther-plantation politics, far and above any other famous black person on this subject.
In addition, while rape is generally agreed to be an act of violence and not that of sexual conquest, these allegations against Cosby are made within a heavy air of sexual promiscuousness - i.e. the Playboy mansion and its parties and social milieu. Therefore to get a really goos look at the extremity of these charges, one must consciously subtract any and all need for sexual conquests of any kind whatsoever, because he was fully immersed in alll of those types of successes. What is left, according to these allegations, is a specific kind rape perversion requiring drugging - that's it. Supposedly, Cosby wanted that specific thing and nothing else, even though he was making all possible alternative, legal, effortless sexual conquests becaue of his fame and wealth.
That changes things - a lot. That's actually a charge of insanity - and it is made with zero evidence and decades in the past, against a man who has pursued a career based on healing the race divide, acclimizing white people to the normalcy of black people, refusing to use even mild swear words in a business that has become based on the filthiest of talk, and supporting specifically family-oriented values - for a half-century.
But now, because some women are now slandering him, we're supposed to throw out his entire life and accuse him of absolute vileness, deny the massive political realities he lives and represents, destroy his character utterly, literally from the highest to the lowest.
What someone chooses to "believe" in this situation, as it stands, lacking any evidence let alone proof, says FAR more about them than Cosby.
You are pretending that Cosby is a political conservative and supports republican positions, and you claim that I am lying about his politics?
You also claim the rapes are all Playboy mansion related, how many are actually claimed to have happened at the Playboy mansion, one?
They took place in the women’s homes, at meetings at Bill’s homes in various states, on the beach, in restaurants, at parties, at studios where they worked with him, in the green room of the Tonight show on and other places than the (one?) at the Playboy mansion, and hotel suites.
You then revert to your argument that rape is for the guys having trouble getting girls, which is absurd. The married bill cosby did not rape to get sex, but raped for the act of the rape, and the control and the same reasons that other serial rapists perform that criminal attack on women, they aren’t doing it because they can’t get a date, or afford a call girl.
When do you think the first police report was filed and the first rumors appeared? How about the late 1990s and 2000.
And what plantation did Cosby leave?
Cosby is a big Obama supporter, a lifelong democrat, despises republicans and has called them racist, and was a promoter of the Tawana brawley rape hoax.
From newsbusters: Bill Cosby Rants Against Republicans, Compares Them to Segregationists for Not Applauding Obama
By Matthew Sheffield | March 5, 2013
Unless he had just eaten a bad cup of Jell-O pudding, it would appear that actor and comedian Bill Cosby seems to really, really hate Republicans.
The veteran entertainer made that very clear Monday morning when he claimed that Republicans not applauding President Obama’s State of the Union address in unison with Democrats were “as bad as the people who were against any kind of desegregation.” He also wondered aloud about whether or not Republicans today are upset that slavery is no longer legal.
Cosby made these remarks on the CNN morning show “Starting Point” after soon-to-be-former host Soledad O’Brien referenced how much better things have gotten for those of African ancestry inside the United States since the 1960s civil rights movement.
The famous comedian and longtime Jell-O pitchman rejected her statement.
“I don’t think so,” he said. “Not when you look at the president’s speech recently. To see people sitting down and then they there are others standing and cheering. I don’t think it’s difficult believe. I think that we have people sitting there who are as bad as the people who were against any kind of desegregation.”
(snip)
I think it’s dumb to say is it time when we stand and say the pledge of allegiance, for which it stands. Where are you going with this? Where are you going with the promise of what the United States of America really is?
It’s also interesting that this Republican Party is not the Republican Party of 1863, of Abraham Lincoln, abolitionists and slavery, is not good. I think it’s important for us to look at the underlying part of it. What is the value of it? Is it that some people are angry because my people no longer want to work for free?”