Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xone

The fact that it is altered to not be ear damaging, isn’t that a good reason to make the rule be to ask people to put suppressors on their guns when target practicing? Think about it. If I was living out in rural PA, and you wanted to practice shooting in your yard? Wouldn’t you want to lessen whatever was audible to me say, a ways down the road, for courtesy’s sake. I would!


55 posted on 12/07/2014 4:10:12 PM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Morpheus2009
for courtesy’s sake.

I supposed that could be a secondary concern, I'd do it so I could shoot without ears. After that range time, the lure of multiple suppressors has been compelling with the paperwork requirements and tax payments being the showstoppers.

make the rule be to ask people to put suppressors on their guns when target practicing

Can't see them as a requirement until paperwork and tax removed to make them more accessible. OTOH, in the country where it is legal to shoot, I wouldn't restrict shooting for noise.

60 posted on 12/07/2014 7:40:14 PM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson