So, we have been informed of the current status up until now about the upcoming nannie bloomers anti-gun initiative for the 2016 ballot. Then this morning, I get the rgj fish wrapper off the drive way and on page 1E is this editorial board opinion of the proposal. Uh, did I wake up in bizarro world? The last sentence of the editorial opinion is: "Nevada’s background check proposal may give the feeling that at least something is being done, but it is not a good use of time and money if the goal is to decrease gun violence." I'm still waiting for the "But..."
http://www.rgj.com/story/opinion/editorials/2014/12/07/editorial-gun-background-check-proposal-ineffective/19553259/
1 posted on
12/07/2014 8:06:42 AM PST by
rktman
To: rktman
2 posted on
12/07/2014 8:07:19 AM PST by
rktman
(Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
To: rktman
People want to register themselves while the pedophiles will avoid registration.
We are a nation of idiot sheeples in love with big brother.
3 posted on
12/07/2014 8:10:05 AM PST by
lavaroise
(A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
To: rktman
So, they don’t want me personally selling my own gun, what do I do with it then, sell it to a pawn shop? I knew those pawn shops needed a bailout!!!
To: rktman
We need a strong president using the bully pulpit to promote restoration of all 2nd ammendment rights nationally.
5 posted on
12/07/2014 8:28:47 AM PST by
exnavy
(Fish or cut bait ...Got ammo, Godspeed.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson