Did you read the same article?
Seems to me he makes a case that there IS a case for libel. By the fraternity as an institution and by several different individuals, most notably the probably very few male members of her small study group.
He points out that it might not be in the best interest of the person libeled to file suit, but that’s a completely separate issue.
I hope they sue RS for everything they’ve got.
I’m sure I read the same article, but I was left with the impression that any case for libel would be very weak.
I should have also noted that the author was being published in the Washington Post, which makes his conclusion a fait accompli.