[muir_redwoods]

So she’s offering no defence against the NRA’s lawsuit? Isn’t that good news? Isn’t that rolling over and leaving it to the governor to defend if he will? I’m confused.

[Renegade]

In reality she should be defending PASSAGE of the law as it passed with a 2-1 majority vote and was signed by the governer

[tanknetter]

So she’s offering no defence against the NRA’s lawsuit? Isn’t that good news? Isn’t that rolling over and leaving it to the governor to defend if he will? I’m confused.

The article is poorly worded.

My read is that there's a pro-gun law on the PA books that passed overwhelmingly. There's a lawsuit by gungrabbers challenging that law. The PA AG is refusing to defend the law against the gungrabbers.

As said above, this is a backdoor way to use the judicial system to negate popular, duly-passed and enacted laws. The defendant refuses to defend, and there's summary judgement in the plaintiff's favor.