Posted on 12/03/2014 4:12:19 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The White House response to Ferguson wouldnt be complete without a meeting with Al Sharpton, the infamous agitator who has become President Barack Obamas go-to man on race, in the words of a Politico headline from last August.
So Sharpton was inevitably one of the civil-rights leaders at a White House meeting Monday. The president no doubt passed up the opportunity to direct Sharpton to the Treasury Department up the street, which would surely love to have him visit and make good on all the taxes he has avoided paying through the years.
A New York Times report found that there are $4.5 million in state and federal tax liens against him and his businesses. If the rest of the country had Sharptons accountant, there would be no reason for anyone to call for tax cuts. Our complex and onerous tax code would be rendered irrelevant by simple nonpayment.
Despite a disdain for the Internal Revenue Service that would make the average anarcho-libertarian blush (among other embarrassments and scandals), Sharpton has leveraged himself into respectability with the Democratic establishment by making himself central to any national racial controversy. By rights, he should have given up any pretense to criminal forensics after his defamatory role in the Tawana Brawley hoax in the 1980s, but there he was in Ferguson, Mo., suggesting the worst despite what turned out to be strong evidence that Officer Darren Wilson acted lawfully.
When the grand jury found there was insufficient evidence to indict Wilson, Sharpton pronounced that the Ferguson protesters had lost the battle, but not the war. What are they going to do to win, go out and find another cop to falsely accuse of a racial assassination and attempt to railroad into an indictment and conviction?
The Ferguson story has progressed from the tragedy of the initial incident to the outrage of the violence of the protests to a new phase of charade. The federal government must pretend to do something because it must . . . do something.
But what national initiative is going to stop police officers from defending themselves when they feel as if they are under mortal threat, as Officer Wilson says he did?
The Justice Department investigation of Wilson on civil-rights grounds will almost certainly lead nowhere. The standard for such a prosecution is high, and if the evidence didnt merit a routine criminal prosecution, there is no way it can reasonably support a civil-rights charge.
President Obama is ordering the streamlining of the rules for providing surplus military equipment to police departments. Fine. But the militarization of the police had nothing to do with the original confrontation between Wilson and Michael Brown, and nothing to do with the ensuing violent protests in Ferguson, which rolled on regardless of the posture of the police.
The president wants funding for more body-worn cameras for local police, a worthy-enough experiment. But such a camera, assuming that what it captured was consistent with the most credible evidence, would have served to vindicate Wilsons version of events rather than the protesters narrative of an extralegal killing.
The most needful reform in Ferguson and surrounding communities, per the excellent reporting of Radley Balko of the Washington Post, is the end of the obnoxious and parasitic practice of squeezing revenue out of residents with fines from traffic and other petty offenses. This creates an incentive for police to hassle motorists and is especially burdensome to poor residents. Because this issue is exceedingly local and dull, almost no one talks about it.
The facts have stopped mattering in Ferguson, if they ever did. It is probably destined to live on in the roll call of locales, like Selma and Birmingham, that are bywords for civil-rights abuses. Never mind that this distorts what happened in Ferguson and belittles the memory of past civil-rights battles. There are too many people too vested in the myth, with Al Sharpton leading the way.
You know who closed down the speed traps in Georgia?
Gov. Lester Maddox.
I'm waiting for the split-sceen where Al asks the questions and the prerecorded Al gives the answers.
lol
Why doesn’t he have charges brought against him for not paying his taxes? Who would bring charges? Any of us would. It’s insane what that man gets away with. No wonder he is so arrogant.
The most transparent administration in history.
Their motives are that obvious.
If all the TV networks, including those on Cable TV, agreed NOT to cover any press conference or action by Sharpton, he would begin to fade from the public’s eye and his influence would begin to wain.
He is a media creation and a media whore so he should be tried as an infected whore, and shunned.
Only MSNBC would keep him on even if he raped Mother Teresa. However, their viewers could hardly fill a baseballs stadium but would fill every insane asylum in the country.
It’s going to be a long 2 years. I don’t think there’s even been a time in history when the people wanted a president to be removed from office this badly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.