Posted on 12/03/2014 8:56:46 AM PST by Whenifhow
Trey Gowdy DESTROYS Marielena Hincapie for bringing race as an excuse for republicans response to the immigration debate At Immigration Executive Action Hearing.
Earlier in the hearing:
Steve Cohen TN Democrat in Q & A
AT 4:42 is the question to Marielena Hincapie Ms Hincapie, do you believe that the reason why the response to this has been so different for this president is because of the number or is there another reason?
Marielena Hincapie: I do believe this is different - he is the first African American president….he is being attacked for a number of issues.....
5:44 Minutes Congressman Cohen On President Obama's Immigration Executive Actions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kRHDXoVsMY
Executive Action on Immigration
http://www.c-span.org/video/?323021-1/house-judiciary-committee-hearing-executive-action-immigration&live
Steve Cohen TN Democrat in Q & A
AT 4:42 is the question to Marielena Hincapie Ms Hincapie, do you believe that the reason why the response to this has been so different for this president is because of the number or is there another reason?
Marielena Hincapie: I do believe this is different - he is the first African American president….he is being attacked for a number of issues.....
5:44 Minutes Congressman Cohen On President Obama’s Immigration Executive Actions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kRHDXoVsMY
Later...
5:31 Minutes
Trey Gowdy DESTROYS Marielena Hincapie At Immigration Executive Action Hearing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yd-AbochrgE
number?
Manipulating your opponent is not “caving.”
The prosecutor knows when to give the defendant rope.
. do you believe that the reason why the response to this has been so different for this president is because of the number or is...
number?
**********
Was there an error in the post?
We all love to see these smarmy bureaucrats taken apart at these hearings, but I really want to see congress take concrete steps to STOP them from ripping our Constitution apart.
I didn’t see “destruction”, much as I admire Gowdy.
The administration has created a massive swarm of testifying insects who can be swatted at, but even a skilled interrogator such as Gowdy has some trouble hitting anything but air.
500 times better than Issa, though.
I don’t know... I just don’t understand the quote I posted. Number of what?
I’ll have time in a bit to read the whole article maybe that will clear it up
The number of illegal immigrants Obama wants to give “Amnesty-lite” to.
Just guessing from the context, but it sounds like Mr. Gowdey is referencing the "number of immigrants" being promised the moon by odinga. "This time", as opposed to previous promises made by the traitors of both parties.
thanks boogieman - i’ll consume the entire article at lunch :)
Exactly what I was thinking.
Don’t you love how the sleazy Marxist air quotes everything as if her words are so brilliant.
Pray America is waking
I see that I’m not the only one who’s responses end up as gibberish on the screen, what has been happening to the site?
I didn’t see “destruction”, much as I admire Gowdy.
************
The video title was “Trey Gowdy DESTROYS Marielena Hincapie At Immigration Executive Action Hearing” and it was posted according to customary procedure.
No other rep noticed or was willing to challenge her on the comments she made.
number (of illegals)
I don’t know... I just don’t understand the quote I posted. Number of what?
************
In the line of questioning from Steve Cohen, he was asking Jay Sekulow about the other presidents who used executive action and why no one talked about impeachment, filed lawsuit, etc in those cases.
Sekulow quoted the president who was heckled and responded that he had “changed the law”.
earlier or sometime in his testimony...
Sekulow was indicating that the other presidents may have used it (with or without congress), but none in this scope of the “numbers” affected by Obama’s amnesty which is around 5 million.
I can appreciate there is no connection whatsoever in the English language between the words “DESTROY” and “DESTRUCTION” and really don’t care about whatever “procedure” you are talking about.
All I am saying is that Gowdy did not connect with her commentary by way of negating it. Contrast that with any other Youtube you can find where in general, he really attacks witness testimony, very effectively. In this case his attacks very noticeably sailed right by her testimony.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.