Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/03/2014 6:21:33 AM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Second Amendment First

the Oath Keepers are going to “Stay The Course”....


2 posted on 12/03/2014 6:25:12 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

3 posted on 12/03/2014 6:25:52 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Dear colleagues,
I think Oath Keepers, or something like it, is the key to our survival. We need to work in structured teams to protect our families and property in chaotic and lawless conditions.


4 posted on 12/03/2014 6:28:21 AM PST by olepap (Your old Pappy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

What? The Nation Media isn’t all over this feel-good story of bravery and self-sacrifice? A white man PROTECTING a black woman from other blacks determined to destroy her business and livelihood?

*Crickets Chirping*


5 posted on 12/03/2014 6:30:10 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Of course St. Louis County attempted to stop the Oath Keepers. Hell, one of them might possibly have hurt one of the sainted looters.

Besides, I suspect orders came down from ‘on high’ to not only go easy on the “Peaceful Protesters” but to take away the threat to them from evil white militia(s).
So they went for the low hanging fruit, the people that would obey lawful orders. Turns out the orders were not lawful, but that got them off the roofs before they possibly hurt one of the rioters er “Peaceful Protesters”.


6 posted on 12/03/2014 6:30:15 AM PST by Tupelo (I am feeling more like Phillip Nolan by the day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

This Isn't Civil Rights


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You

7 posted on 12/03/2014 6:31:38 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

They need to be there; the police under liberal supervision have to just stand there and watch as they “Burn The Bitch Down”.


8 posted on 12/03/2014 6:35:56 AM PST by PoloSec ( Believe the Gospel: how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
Since they’ve been back on the rooftops, Andrews said police haven’t tried to enforce the ordinance.

The ordinance is not being violated, so there is no need to enforce. Any other reading of it would subject owners of a business to having a background check in order to secure his own building.
11 posted on 12/03/2014 6:41:56 AM PST by Dr. Sivana ("If you're litigating against nuns, you've probably done something wrong."-Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Did the rioters in St. Louis Co. have valid permits to protest? Or are they exempt from the law?


12 posted on 12/03/2014 6:43:25 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
Big Boys (aka; adults) with guns are aok protecting a property owners property (and lives) as long as they are NOT paid services.

Duhhh...1st and 2nd Amendment rights will prevail.

13 posted on 12/03/2014 6:55:30 AM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Apparently, defending yourself is an act of civil disobedience.


14 posted on 12/03/2014 6:55:59 AM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. President zero gave us patient zero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First


15 posted on 12/03/2014 7:06:04 AM PST by Brother Cracker (You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box than 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
Since they’ve been back on the rooftops, Andrews said police haven’t tried to enforce the ordinance.
21 posted on 12/03/2014 7:26:01 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
ANARCHO-TYRANNY:

Some laws, the ones that oppress the mainstream and law-abiding folks, are enforced. You know, like the law about helping to protect a business from savage looters and arsonists.

HOWEVER, other laws like the ones against looting and burning down businesses, are not enforced.

This results in a totalitarian police state, and a FReeper pointed out yesterday that the Soviets did the exact same thing to keep the populace under control: the state used common criminals to terrorize the citizens.

22 posted on 12/03/2014 7:27:36 AM PST by T-Bone Texan (The time is now to form up into leaderless cells of 5 men or less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First
Just put out cupcakes and punch and call them "party guests".

Besides that, Oathkeepers don't accept just anyone, they are pretty picky about who they associate with as members. I don't believe they are going to dig up any untrained members.

23 posted on 12/03/2014 7:29:25 AM PST by FunkyZero (... I've got a Grand Piano to prop up my mortal remains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

We’re regulating people who help to keep order in a time of riot and looting?

Stuck on stupid.


25 posted on 12/03/2014 7:46:58 AM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Yeah, the Oath Keepers should stand down just as soon as the Ferguson cops go ask the rioters for their “looting permit”.


26 posted on 12/03/2014 8:00:39 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

Haha.


27 posted on 12/03/2014 8:31:12 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

You have to remember yo pay the toll to the governmental troll.As long as you pay their requisite fees your all right.

It has zero to do with training.


28 posted on 12/03/2014 8:50:57 AM PST by puppypusher ( The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Second Amendment First

bkmk


29 posted on 12/03/2014 9:16:49 AM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson