Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tanknetter

From what I understand, when the Royal Navy was dithering back and forth between CATOBAR and STOVL for the Queen Elizabeth, the limiting factor was the cost of retrofitting an unproven EMALS system into a ship already under construction.

Being an ignorant former enlisted blue-suiter, it would be my guess that retrofitting arresting gear wouldn’t be quite as involved as the catapulting gear.

Wouldn’t a COD be operating at a higher landing weight than an F-35C?


9 posted on 12/03/2014 6:27:58 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

The COD might have a higher weight (then again the F-35 is nicknamed the Fat-35 for a reason), but much lower landing speeds (and possibly a lesser sink rate) due to the long, straight wings.


10 posted on 12/03/2014 7:29:40 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson