Posted on 12/02/2014 11:56:41 AM PST by Kaslin
Yup.
What’s wrong with American workers?
Any one want to give them pink slips, raise your hands.
In one load, no.
But in the time it takes a ship to cross the ocean, many flights could be made.
I think all information, spoken or data, carried over the airwaves between people in the United States should be transmitted and received over equipment made exclusively in the USA.
Tell the owners of Canadian National RR about the Jones Act.
They bought US Steel’s iron ore carriers that haul from US port to US port,,,
Remember, regardless of Congress’s impressive track record for making constitutionally complaint laws (sarc), all federal laws need to be checked against Congress’s constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers.
Regarding U.S. ports for example, are these federal ports purchased under the Constitution’s Clause 17 of Section 8 of Article I?
Also, if U.S. ships (and what is a U.S. ship defined as?) transport goods between two ports in the same state, I don’t see how the Constitution’s Commerce Clause (1.8.3) would apply.
On the other hand, if the ports are in different states then all bets are off.
Otherwise, what am I overlooking?
I think the important thing to note is that this law
does not apply to shipping to/from China and San Francisco, but it
does apply to shipping to/from San Francisco and Portland.
I’ve worked projects where the base of the oil platform was built there then sent to Texas to be fitted up with the complex process equipment for installation in Gulf of Mexico.
Apples and oranges. The slowdown in the ports are due to the longshoremen and then obsolence of the port facilities. The Jones Act doesn’t have anything to do with either of those.
The next step after that would be for us to ratify LOST (UN treaty)... I don’t want any non-Americans commanding ships that float our coastal/inland waterways. I have already had enough of China and others buying all the property they can get their hands on.
The NLRA is the problem, not the Jones Act. Thank FDR for that.
Do you believe that vessels from other nations do not enter and use our coastal/inland waterways.
They do, but I don’t want it to be a free for all. We already do a poor job of monitoring them all.
I read the Wiki article. Your piece leaves out tons of needed information like:
The American shipbuilding industry is booming right now. Wonder why that was left out?
The GAO says that any potential damages are unmeasurable and can’t be proven.
The Jones Act was updated as recently as 2006.
Ships can apply for and get waivers.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merchant_Marine_Act_of_1920
“If you like your job going to a Third World country, by all means vote to abolish the American merchant marine.”
So tell us, which union do you belong to? There simply isn’t anything about the Longshoremen that shouldn’t be abolished. As I child, I remember Harry Bridges (ILWU President, Non-US Citizen, and Communist) putting his members on the streets of San Francisco where they actually murdered a few people to get their way.
That's simply not true. Foreign ships may, in fact, take cargo directly to Hawaii. Most large container ships do not do that, though, and instead bring it to the West Coast, where it is then shipped back to Hawaii by U.S. shippers. But that's not required by the Jones Act - it is simply because it makes more economic sense for the foreign shipper to unload all of its cargo in a West Coast port, rather than stopping in Hawaii on the way to drop off a small portion of its cargo.
Why would Asian ships bringing goods to Hawaii have to drop it in San Francisco? Asia to Hawaii isn’t between two U.S. ports. And prohibiting foreign vessels from helping us out with the gulf coast oil spill was just bonehead stupid, Obama sucking up to the Commies, er, unions. Where were his executive orders when all that was happening?
The Jones Act can only be waived if is determined that such a waiver is “necessary in the interest of national defense” – which is a high bar and rarely invoked.
http://www.maritime-executive.com/article/Editorial-Lazy-Jones-Act-Thinking-2014-02-21
Want energy independence? Waive the Jones Act
http://www.aei.org/publication/want-energy-independence-waive-the-jones-act/
Because there isn’t enough pipeline or rail capacity to handle the enormous quantities of unconventional oil being produced in North America — much of it oil-sands crude from Alberta and “tight oil” from the Bakken shale formation in North Dakota – the oil must be transported by a fleet of tankers and barges to mid-Atlantic refineries that can process it. But there aren’t enough vessels to ship the oil due to the Jones Act – which requires that all cargoes transported between U.S. ports be carried on U.S.-owned ships, built and registered in the U.S., and manned by U.S. crews.
Thanks to this protectionist statute, there is now a glut of sweet crude at Gulf ports, which has caused a backup that could start to slow oil production in North Dakota and at the Eagle Ford shale in south Texas.
I believe this act is the reason cruise ships have to stop in Canada on their way to Anchorage from Seattle. How it helps American business is anyone’s guess.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.