Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MO Governor ‘Punished’ Ferguson For Refusing to Fire Darren Wilson, Tom Jackson
gotnews ^ | November 25, 2014 | Charles C. Johnson

Posted on 11/27/2014 4:06:46 AM PST by WhiskeyX

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: WhiskeyX

Mean spirited man. A lot of Dims seem to be mean spirited and revengeful. I think they have a deep void; full of hate which is directed toward Christians and towards Truth. I am so sad for them.


41 posted on 11/27/2014 6:33:15 AM PST by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

“What you are reporting as news is nothing more than pure speculation, and no better than the Ferguson grand jury witnesses who admitted under oath that they really didn’t witness anything,”

no, that comment totally misrepresents the situation. You have the open concerns of the Lt. Governor of the State of Missouri and the Mayor of Ferguson stopping just short of a similar allegation. Then you have the allegation of Gov. Nixon punishing the City of Ferguson for not complying wishes which are in the record. That allegation, however, allegedly comes from an anonymous source within the Ferguson police department. Because the news reporter’s source wished to remain anonymous, wee readers have no means of evaluating the credibility of such an anonymous source, except for its alleged place of origin. This, it is more than mere speculation. Instead, this is typical of many previous whistleblower reports, which ultimately proved to be true; Deep Throat and Watergate.

The Lt. Gov. and the Mayor of Ferguson are already openly suspicious of Gov. Nixon’s refusal to deploy the National Guard in Ferguson before the riots destroyed its commercial districts. This anonymous source is little different than the suspicions already openly voiced by them, so why not keep an open mind and investigate further?


42 posted on 11/27/2014 6:36:32 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Missouri is getting what they deserve if this is true. Ferguson is what one gets if the Democrats control the law and government.


43 posted on 11/27/2014 7:02:47 AM PST by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Sentence doesn’t make any sense. I’ve read it 3x and gave up.


44 posted on 11/27/2014 7:33:52 AM PST by Carriage Hill ( Some days you're the windshield, and some days you're the bug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

They’re saying Gov. Nixon refused to send the National Guard to protect the businesses in the City of Ferguson before the looters burned them down, because the City of Ferguson refused to fire Officer Darren Wilson and Chief of Police Tom Jackson as previously demanded by Gov. Nixon.


45 posted on 11/27/2014 8:19:29 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
If true, Nixon needs to be in prison.

Or at least sued for every dollar he has by business owner victims of Ferguson.

46 posted on 11/27/2014 8:21:32 AM PST by catfish1957 (Everything I needed to know about Islam was written on 11 Sep 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson