Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
The bastards just don't understand the meaning of “shall not be infringed.” There should be now gun laws or AMMO laws because they would, by definition, infringe on the right to bear arms given to us by the 2nd amendment.
8 posted on 11/25/2014 2:41:32 PM PST by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BatGuano

Make that “be no gun laws....” Sorry


11 posted on 11/25/2014 2:46:13 PM PST by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BatGuano
The bastards just don't understand the meaning of “shall not be infringed.” There should be now gun laws or AMMO laws because they would, by definition, infringe on the right to bear arms given guaranteed to us by the 2nd amendment.

A slight edit for clarification, FRiend.

16 posted on 11/25/2014 3:11:26 PM PST by MortMan (All those in favor of gun control raise both hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: BatGuano

The Constitution does not give rights. It recognizes and protects natural rights that already exist. Don’t let anyone try to convince you otherwise.


18 posted on 11/25/2014 3:17:51 PM PST by Cololeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson