Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It’s Time To Exercise the Legislative “Veto”
thefederalist.com ^ | 11/24/14 | David Corbin and Matt Parks

Posted on 11/25/2014 7:31:28 AM PST by cotton1706

The apoplectic and apocalyptic will scoff at the suggestion that this past week’s executive amnesty could help fuel a partial revitalization of our republic. So why is there room for optimism that something can be done–and what?

President Obama’s threatened and now announced executive amnesty has, not for the first time, drawn pundits, politicians, and the American people, Left and Right, back to the Constitution to reflect on what, exactly, the president and Congress are supposed to do. That, in and of itself, is a good thing–an indication that, at some level, we all still recognize the need to square our political behavior with our (collective) political principles.

Judging by the results, those on the Left have not liked what they have found in the Constitution. The leading talking point of the last week has been “Republican presidents (including Ronald Reagan) did the same thing.” A number of people have shown (see here and here) that, in fact, the actions of President Reagan and his successor, George H.W. Bush, are clearly distinguishable from President Obama’s.

But suppose they weren’t. Tu quoque (“you too!”) may be good politics, but it’s bad logic and, if possible, worse legal and constitutional reasoning. (It’s not a solid defense against speeding to suggest that you were only keeping pace with the car in front of you.) Better to conclude that both Republican and Democratic presidents have violated the plain intent of the Constitution than to wrench the Constitution into justifying what they did, simply out of partisan loyalty. Are any of us willing to prostitute our integrity for parties so unworthy of the sacrifice?

(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; randnesty
The checks and balances of republican government are the age-old answer to tyranny!


1 posted on 11/25/2014 7:31:28 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

The president cannot issue a blanket order to just ignore the law. Part of his oath wast to dutifully execute the duties of his office and among those duties was the requirement to carry out the laws. To ignore them is to commit an impeachable defense.


2 posted on 11/25/2014 7:48:08 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Good Muslims, like good Nazis or good liberals, are terrible human beings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

I’ve been telling everyone to Veto! Obama since the day he was elected.


3 posted on 11/25/2014 8:59:02 AM PST by Veto! ( Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
The president cannot issue a blanket order to just ignore the law.

Says you. Who shall stop him? Only Congress can prevent an unlawful presidential action. They so far refuse to honor their oath of office.

4 posted on 11/25/2014 6:20:29 PM PST by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson