To: PROCON
She is a very dangerous candidate . She is OBAMAII
10 posted on
11/21/2014 5:40:16 PM PST by
Chickensoup
(Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
To: Chickensoup
I prefer Baraq 2.0 but yes you’re correct.
13 posted on
11/21/2014 5:41:46 PM PST by
nascarnation
(Impeach, Convict, Deport)
To: Chickensoup
She is a very dangerous candidate . She is OBAMAIIShe's a tall, black mulatto?
She doesn't have a chance. Do you think the soccer moms are going to vote for a small, scrawny, unimposing communist?
16 posted on
11/21/2014 5:43:52 PM PST by
PROCON
(Always give 100%...unless you're donating blood.)
To: Chickensoup
I’m with you. There’s a reason Jarrett is lining up behind her.
As awful as Obama is, he had to run under the pretense of being a pro-free market Christian.
With Warren and Sanders (her likely running mate), the mask comes off completely. In my estimation, that makes them orders of magnitude more dangerous than Obama circa 2008. especially with the precedent for the abuse of office he’s leaving behind.
Warren’s supporters give me visions of Kristallnacht.
41 posted on
11/21/2014 6:17:52 PM PST by
WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
(The greatest trick the Soviets ever pulled was convincing the world they didn't exist.)
To: Chickensoup
She is a very dangerous candidate . She is OBAMAII
She won't get a Black avalanche, and there aren't enough injuns to matter.
42 posted on
11/21/2014 6:20:06 PM PST by
867V309
(Crusade: the only solution.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson