Skip to comments.
House files challenge over the changes to the affordable care act (Case 1:14-cv-01967)
http://jonathanturley.org/2014/11/21/house-files-challenge-over-the-changes-to-the-affordable-care-act/ ^
| November 21, 2014
| jonathanturley
Posted on 11/21/2014 8:19:25 AM PST by justlittleoleme
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: justlittleoleme
For the record, I hate this lawsuit. Basically, if the GOP were to win this case, then they would essentially succeed in getting Obamacare FULLY implemented, exactly as it was written into law! How frickin’ bass-ackwards is this???
To: justlittleoleme
Good...now be ready to immediately file against EO Amnesty.
3
posted on
11/21/2014 8:29:39 AM PST
by
Jane Long
("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
To: Jane Long
I think this is what it is actually about, setting precedent that Obama acting without congress like this, is unlawful and unconstitutional.
To: Jane Long
Don’t hold your breath waiting.
5
posted on
11/21/2014 8:33:18 AM PST
by
Ingtar
(Is this the Ebola and rumors of Ebola mentioned in the Bible?)
To: DestroyLiberalism
Perhaps, but the progressive Dems own this monstrosity of a law. Let it either be implemented in full, or not at all, preferably not at all.
6
posted on
11/21/2014 8:33:46 AM PST
by
MeatshieldActual
(Texan Independence, now and forever!)
To: Jane Long
Jane Long wrote:
<<
Good...now be ready to immediately file against EO Amnesty.
>>
************************************************************
With the federal courts now packed with radical leftist judges, how confident are you that the GOP can successfully sue its way into stopping the Kenyan Marxist from regularly and flagrantly violating the U.S. Constitution?
To: justlittleoleme
So essentially, they have no idea what they’re doing. Time not to only have Bonehead not speaker, but voted out of office. Preferably a vote of no-confidence to get rid of him sooner.
8
posted on
11/21/2014 8:34:56 AM PST
by
wastedyears
(I may be stupid, but at least I'm not Darwin Awards stupid.)
To: justlittleoleme
WALL STREET JOURNAL FLASH:House Republicans authorized the filing of the lawsuit earlier this year, but it has been delayed by struggles to find a lawyer to file the case. Two law firms dropped the case before Republicans tapped attorney Jonathan Turley to pursue the case.
Shocking that no conservative leaning firm would take the case and they had to hire Liberal (but fair) Turley to take the case. I think I remember that firms did not want the case because they would be blacklisted and lose business. Since Turley is in Academia, he can take the case.
To: DestroyLiberalism
Well, I’m not willing to stop trying. Are you?
I’d rather them use every means available...and try...than DO NOTHING - out of fear of “radical leftist judges”, or backlash, or whatever excuse.
10
posted on
11/21/2014 8:38:00 AM PST
by
Jane Long
("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
To: Jane Long
Good...now be ready to immediately file against EO Amnesty. It should have been done the first thing this morning.
And they should have immediately filed for an injunction.
Asleep at the wheel as usual.
11
posted on
11/21/2014 8:38:02 AM PST
by
Iron Munro
(Obama "I stand with the 2/3 who were too lazy, disinterested, stupid or dead to vote")
To: justlittleoleme
Oh boy, precedent, because that legal concept has been so good for this country, and has inspired so many great rulings.
12
posted on
11/21/2014 8:38:11 AM PST
by
wastedyears
(I may be stupid, but at least I'm not Darwin Awards stupid.)
To: justlittleoleme
0’s EO Amnesty = No Need for Congress
13
posted on
11/21/2014 8:38:42 AM PST
by
Jane Long
("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
To: Iron Munro
It should have been done the first thing this morning.
And they should have immediately filed for an injunction.
Agree. And, the Pubbie Governors Assn should’ve been right there with them.
....ZZzzzZZZZzzzz....
EO Amnesty = NO Need for Congress
14
posted on
11/21/2014 8:40:45 AM PST
by
Jane Long
("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
To: DestroyLiberalism
For the record, I hate this lawsuit. Basically, if the GOP were to win this case, then they would essentially succeed in getting Obamacare FULLY implemented, exactly as it was written into law! How frickin bass-ackwards is this??? Tthe people most instrumental in implementing this law (UNIONS) have been shielded from the impact of the law. ART OF WAR is to bring the fight to the people influencing the war but not on the front lines. Bring the Unions into the monster and see how fast they turn on Obama.
To: justlittleoleme
I think it is giving them cover to avoid any Obamacare entanglements for the next two years. People want them to do something, but they are too cowardly, or complicit. Now they can say, “Lets let the lawsuit proceed.” They can claim it will end Obamacare as well as establish the precedent you point out.
16
posted on
11/21/2014 8:44:19 AM PST
by
Yogafist
To: 11th Commandment
Tthe people most instrumental in implementing this law (UNIONS) have been shielded from the impact of the law. ART OF WAR is to bring the fight to the people influencing the war but not on the front lines. Bring the Unions into the monster and see how fast they turn on Obama.
Is the exemption for Congress and congressional staff one of the things that would be repealed if they win? Cause that would definitely have an impact if the high-and-mighty legislators were forced into the same crap as us meager peasants.
17
posted on
11/21/2014 8:47:12 AM PST
by
caligatrux
(Rage, rage against the dying of the light.)
To: DestroyLiberalism
For the record, I hate this lawsuit. Basically, if the GOP were to win this case, then they would essentially succeed in getting Obamacare FULLY implemented, exactly as it was written into law! How frickin bass-ackwards is this??? The best way to get rid of a bad law is to enforce it to the letter.
18
posted on
11/21/2014 8:51:04 AM PST
by
kevkrom
(I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
To: DestroyLiberalism
It’s not back asswards. It’s exactly their goal.
They don’t hate Obamacare. They hate that it has his name on it, and not their’s. If it had been named Romneycare, they would have been pleased as could be.
19
posted on
11/21/2014 8:56:43 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(The mid-term elections were perfect for him. Now Obama can really lead from behind.)
To: justlittleoleme
You have the reasoning. Will it hang in there?
20
posted on
11/21/2014 8:57:59 AM PST
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson