Um, I think you guys have bigger problems than long dead serial killers.
Posted on 11/20/2014 11:08:11 AM PST by the scotsman
You could be right. Kolcheck was a news guy not a journalist.
What relevance does Bill Cosby drugging and raping women have to this thread?
And your proof of this alleged behavior by Bill Cosby is???
Proof?
You mean OJ Simpson proof and Bill Clinton proof?
Smarminess is your middle name, eh?
“Seriously, the real J the R was supposed to have the skill of a gifted surgeon, not just a meat carver.”
That’s a myth, some authors just like to state that because their preferred suspect is a surgeon. If you look at the wounds inflicted, it is very sloppy and nothing like what a surgeon might do.
Of course it isn’t, you asked a stupid smarmy question, I put it in perspective.
The democrat/Obama supporter Bill Cosby looks bad on these decades old rumors and claims and the 2000 police report, and the 2004 drug/sexual assault which he settled on after 10 women came forth to testify to their own rapes and assaults, and after his lawyer just reworded his blanket denial of the drugged/rape claims, and after National Enquirer so easily shut up his threat of a 250 million dollar lawsuit and the republican DA who believes he is a rapist, but didn’t feel he had enough evidence to pursue it against such a rich powerful figure.
The count is up to about 15 or more and Lou Ferrigno’s wife just chimed in.
-PJ
it always amazes me when you make one of these unChristian accusations so openly. But then your Christianity may be different from what I learn in Scriptures.
LOL, you want to claim this is a religious discussion?
You must be great on the OJ Simpson, Bill Clinton, and all the other crime threads as you lecture everyone on whatever you are trying to pretend you are lecturing them on.
Post 48 seems to have thrown you off balance so you went in another direction, it is antiChristian to discuss Cosby and his well over a dozen accusers.
As his lawyer just said this week.
“”A blanket denial from Bill Cosby’s lawyer dismissing allegations of sexual abuse by the comedian against several women has been clarified with a subsequent statement.
The new statement released Monday says that Cosby’s denials do not refer to accuser Andrea Constand, whose civil lawsuit against him was settled in 2006.””
“Constand had accused Cosby of drugging and sexually assaulting her in 2004.”
Nice try, but no cigar for you. I was not claiming this was or is a religious discussion. I was merely pointing out your facade fades at times. Times like now, when you rail on and on, with only hearsay and your holier than thou attitude to sustain your spittlegeist. You can be so disgusting at times, ansel, so disgusting.
What is disgusting is how you want to just spew venom in personal attacks.
That is an ugly method of compensating, you should try to get back to a topic, for instance the thread about us speculating on the guilt of this man Charles Lechmere, or your wanting to get off on the Cosby attacks.
Bwahahaha, it is you, ansel, who appear to be ‘getting off’ on the allegations against Cosby. What a maroon you expose yourself to be at times!
I will take your word for the information. You must have a better knowledge of it than I do.
Thanks for the enlightenment.
Obama can’t wait to give him amnesty.
There it is, more of the nasty personal attacks.
My post 43 was in response to the poster that brought it up, you started to run with until you got challenged with facts and then you quickly switched to this personal attack trait of yours that is on display.
Here is a thread where you can defend and discuss Cosby if you desire.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3229238/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.