.jpg)
ICR article image.
Posted on 11/19/2014 7:39:13 AM PST by fishtank
Purpose, Progress, and Promise, Part 2
by Nathaniel T. Jeanson, Ph.D. *
In last month’s article, I described the purpose of ICR’s life sciences research and sketched out the need for a counter-offensive strategy against evolution’s lines of scientific arguments. This month I describe the scope of this counter-offensive.
To reclaim the scientific throne from Darwin, creationists must not only identify the flaws in his explanation, they also need to replace his ideas with scientifically superior ones. Unfortunately, in the intense battle over the details of Darwin’s claims, it’s not always clear precisely which scientific questions need answering. For example, if Darwin’s assertion of “transitional forms” was incorrect, then what was the initial scientific question he was trying to answer with this claim?
(Excerpt) Read more at icr.org ...
ICR article image.
Good article to prompt strategic thinking for creationists.
Jeanson summarizes how tactical victories are not the whole picture.
From the article:
* Dr. Jeanson is Deputy Director for Life Sciences Research and received his Ph.D. in Cell and Developmental Biology from Harvard University.
Cite this article: Nathaniel T. Jeanson, Ph.D. 2014. Purpose, Progress, and Promise, Part 2. Acts & Facts. 43 (11).
“it is clear that many species have formed since the Flood and probably since creation.”
Whoa!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.