Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Keystone veto? White House ducks
The Hill ^ | November 18, 2014 | Justin Sink

Posted on 11/18/2014 12:22:13 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

The White House on Tuesday sidestepped the question of whether President Obama would veto a Senate bill authorizing the Keystone XL pipeline.

Asked repeatedly if the president would put the kibosh on the legislation, White House press secretary Josh Earnest would say only that he did not want to leave reporters with the "impression" the president was leaving his options open.

"I’m not in a position to issue veto threats from here, but … there are similar pieces of legislation that have been introduced in this Congress where the president’s senior advisers have recommended a veto," Earnest said.

Earnest was unequivocal, however, on Obama’s opposition to the bill.

"The State Department is the proper venue for reaching this determination," Earnest said, adding that "it certainly is a piece of legislation that the president doesn't support."

The bill appears one vote shy of the 60 needed for a filibuster-proof majority, but the White House offered no prediction of how the vote would turn out.

"I know that some supporters of the proposal say that they have the votes necessary to pass the bill," Earnest said. "But, you know, they’ll put the bill on the floor tonight and I guess we’ll all find out."

The White House also evaded questions as to whether the president's veto was intended as a bargaining tactic ahead of Republicans taking control of the Senate in January.

By that logic, the administration would pocket veto the bill for now, but offer approval to the GOP-controlled Congress in exchange for one of the president's priorities next year.

"That presupposes that it's going to pass in the Senate [on Tuesday]," Earnest said. "So I think we'll probably wait and see what happens in the Senate, and see whether or not … this comes to the president's desk before we sort of make decisions about the next steps."

The White House spokesman did acknowledge it was "probably fair to say" that the administration was thinking about some of those next steps.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: billcassidy; economy; energy; jobs; keystone; keystonexl; louisiana; marylandrieu; opec; override; pipeline; robmaness; veto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 11/18/2014 12:22:13 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
""The State Department is the proper venue for reaching this determination," Earnest said"

Well, THAT's total Grubering slobering.

2 posted on 11/18/2014 12:24:15 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"The State Department is the proper venue for reaching this determination,"

Agreed. But the time for that determination was years ago. When they won't do their job, someone else eventually will.

3 posted on 11/18/2014 12:25:12 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The answer has already been given

Since the pipeline will not induce unfavorable climate change, the bill will be signed into law.


4 posted on 11/18/2014 12:29:39 PM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Send the POS the bill... make the POS veto it!


5 posted on 11/18/2014 12:30:38 PM PST by Common Sense 101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The bill appears one vote shy of the 60 needed for a filibuster-proof majority, but the White House offered no prediction of how the vote would turn out.

Who would filibuster, and how long do you think they would last? I for one would welcome a filibuster. It would draw the attention of the public to see that the Democrats are blocking a project that would create thousands of jobs and reduce our dependence on foreign (i.e., Middle East oil)

6 posted on 11/18/2014 12:32:01 PM PST by Cowboy Bob (They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

We all know why it is one vote shy...to give her to look as if she cares and give eboma no way to have to veto the vote.


7 posted on 11/18/2014 12:32:01 PM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"The White House on Tuesday sidestepped the question of whether President Obama would veto a Senate bill authorizing the Keystone XL pipeline."

Well, I have an idea. Just send President Ebola the bill and let him veto it. Then everyone will know where the pResident who masquerades as an American stands on the issue.

8 posted on 11/18/2014 12:33:18 PM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"The State Department's "Global-Warming Water Boy" is the proper venue for reaching this determination," Earnest said, adding that "it certainly is a piece of legislation that the president doesn't support."

Negotiating or Compromising is only for Republicans.

9 posted on 11/18/2014 12:34:09 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Comcast does not support C SPAN ... guess who I have ....


10 posted on 11/18/2014 12:38:32 PM PST by knarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The WH is a goose....


11 posted on 11/18/2014 12:40:19 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Foggy Bottom is the LAST PLACE for determination of the appropriateness of petroleum pipeline approval on behalf of the peeps of the US.


12 posted on 11/18/2014 12:42:40 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"The State Department is the proper venue for reaching this determination..." but offer approval to the GOP-controlled Congress in exchange for one of the president's priorities next year.

This is an oxymoron.

Either the State Department is the proper venue, making this a treaty, or Congress is the proper venue, making it legislation.

If it is legislation, then Obama is wrong to say that State is the proper venue.

If it is a treaty, then only the Senate needs to vote to ratify it, making the idea that Obama can "offer" it in exchange for other priorities just plain wrong.

-PJ

13 posted on 11/18/2014 12:46:19 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Obama always lets ISIS know our plans... “no boots on the ground”... unless they get a nuke etc... Even tells ISIS what would be more ‘effective’.

Why so tight mouthed with citizens of the United States?


14 posted on 11/18/2014 12:48:56 PM PST by GOPJ (The New York Times is one big fat collection of Jonathan Gruber s...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

If Obama is willing to go to the mat over Keystone then he’s signaling a scorched-earth policy for the remainder of his term. May as well start impeachment proceedings...


15 posted on 11/18/2014 12:53:36 PM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife


16 posted on 11/18/2014 1:23:23 PM PST by Iron Munro (DHS has the same headcount as the US Marine Corps with twice the budget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

“We all know why it is one vote shy...to give her to look as if she cares and give eboma no way to have to veto the vote.”

Actually with 18 years in the senate, not getting 60 votes means she was an abject failure.


17 posted on 11/18/2014 1:23:42 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Ebola: Satan's End Game for Humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Earnest is an even slimier weasel than Carney.

At least Carney looked uncomfortable having to lie for Obama sometimes, this guy acts like he has no conscience whatsoever

18 posted on 11/18/2014 2:31:19 PM PST by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
there are similar pieces of legislation that have been introduced in this Congress where the president’s senior advisers have recommended a veto," Earnest said.

Obama" OK I got it now....

Heads is we have Wagu Beef for lunch

and Tails is for Lobster.

Senior advisor to self "what a dufus"

19 posted on 11/18/2014 2:36:59 PM PST by spokeshave (He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-keystone-xl-climate-state-department-20140131-story.html


20 posted on 11/18/2014 2:48:58 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson