Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GIdget2004
"Judge Nina Pillard wrote in the decision that the compromise helps the plaintiffs wash "their hands of any involvement in providing insurance for contraceptive services."

Clearly, the "compromise" was a ruse to fool the "stupid" public into thinking they weren't paying for contraception/abortion when they really were paying for those "services."
12 posted on 11/14/2014 10:31:59 AM PST by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle
Clearly, the "compromise" was a ruse to fool the "stupid" public into thinking they weren't paying for contraception/abortion

Or at least fool stupid judges


19 posted on 11/14/2014 10:55:17 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson