Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Sivana

He had no chance of blunting Romney. He would have blunted Santorum, they would have split that “Santuckabee” vote and Santorum would have been done early. They’ll both run in 16 and do this to each other in Iowa is my prediction. Huckatorum is not a recipe for victory.


18 posted on 11/13/2014 6:28:35 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright
He would have blunted Santorum, they would have split that “Santuckabee” vote and Santorum would have been done early.

More or less agree, but as the "Not Romneys" got picked through, Huck would have had more staying power than Cain or Gingrich.
21 posted on 11/13/2014 6:33:42 AM PST by Dr. Sivana ("If you're litigating against nuns, you've probably done something wrong."-Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Agreed. Cruz has to expand his base to win. He doesn’t need to “move to the center”, but needs to make moves to expand his base. He has established himself as a strong social conservative. He can reaffirm that when asked, but probably shouldn’t press the issues else risk being stuck splitting that percentage with Santuckabee. He can run a broad based campaign and then inherit the Santuckabee vote when they drop out.


22 posted on 11/13/2014 6:34:37 AM PST by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson