Posted on 11/08/2014 7:47:54 PM PST by Lorianne
Kim Kardashian is angry at a woman the piece refers to as “internet bottom sensation” Jen Selter. Selter has been posting photographs of her large buttocks on Instagram, an activity Kardashian apparently feels is an unacceptable infringement upon her very raison d’etre: one of the gangplanks of Kim Kardashian’s global celebrity being her nonpareil ability to take photographs of her own large buttocks with a cameraphone.
“Kim thinks Jen copies all her poses … she is fuming as she feels her curvy bum is one of her most unique selling points and feels that Jen is just trying to cash in.”
“Insiders say Kim has sought legal advice to see if they can stop Jen,” it read, raising the very real possibility that, somewhere in California, a crack team of lawyers may at this very moment be working around the clock to copyright buttocks on behalf of Kim Kardashian.
You may say this is an entirely ridiculous scenario – we are all, God willing, born with buttocks, Kanye West’s wife can’t just carry on as if she personally invented the concept of having an arse. To which Lost in Showbiz can only respond: do you know how much money these people have? They can bankroll the best legal minds in America! Frankly, if anyone can copyright the concept of buttocks, it’s the West-Kardashians.
Lost in Showbiz envisages a dystopian future, in which no man or woman is legally allowed to have buttocks without first applying to Kim Kardashian for a licence: those unable to produce the right documentation on request forced to suffer the horrifying consequences. Terrorism, ebola, now Kim Kardashian quite literally trying to pinch our arses: can 2014 get any worse?
(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...
There are 3.5 billion women on the planet, and only ONE of them can be famous for her bum — that’s Kim Kardashian! No other woman may flaunt their booty. It’s simply not allowed. Kim has spoken.
a “crack” team of lawyers (cue Beavis laugh-track)
I, for one, do not fine Kim Kardashian’s HUGE butt the least bit attractive. Actually, it’s kind of repulsive. But I guess that’s just me.
I know this a personal preference thing, but, she’s got a huge ass. It’s huge. It’s fat. It’s a huge, fat ass.
If you’re in to that....good for you.
Her a&& is ugly.
IBTFBGL (In Before The Fat-Bottomed Girls Link).
I’d hit it ;-)
I quite agree. Nice is nice, but Kim Kardashian is in a whole other category. It’s freakish and weird, and I’ve never understood why it was a big deal.
Hips and butt she does have. Why do you think they call those animals at the zoo HIPpopotamus?
Agnetha Fältskog had...and may still have...a MUCH better bottom!
If anyone doesn’t know who that is...look it up, especially the pictures.
Fill 'Er Up With Human Fat - Forbes
www.forbes.com/.../fat-fuel-biodiesel-tech-sciences-cz_pcb_1222f... Forbes
Dec 22, 2008 - How a Beverly Hills doctor powered his SUV using his patients' spare tires. ... fat he removed from patients into biodiesel that fueled his Ford SUV
Sorry, n00b, but
I’d hit itTM
is exclusive property of Lazamataz.
Try again later...
It’s not just you.
Does J Lo know about this ?
Fake ass, fake celebrity, fake family.
“I, for one, do not find Kim Kardashian’s HUGE butt the least bit attractive. Actually, it’s kind of repulsive. But I guess that’s just me.”
As an old friend of mine from Abilene, TX would say: “She has an A$$ like a government mule!”
Michelle 0bama is also famous for her butt!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.