Newly discovered fossil could prove a problem for creationists

Washington Post ^ | November 5, 2014 | Rachel Feltman

[DoughtyOne]

I had developed and I thought, posted a response to you before this one. It linked in the PDF page from that site, and addressed that I had enjoyed the video so much I had watching the 1 of 2 in addition to the 2 of 2 you linked me to.

Here’s that guide again:

http://www.ctvn.org/the-programs/origins/episode-guide-origins/

There’s a lot of good information on that site. I bookmarked it.

Thank you very much, and sorry for the oversight of not posting what I developed in response to you.

[DoughtyOne]

BTW: The video you linked me to addressed the magnetic values of various heavenly bodies, the formulas for the original magnetic values for them based on mass and core denisity and how it decays over time.

It was a brilliant presentation making it crystal clear that there are valid reasons for establishing the age of the earth more in line with a 6,000 year age vs 14 billion years.

I found it compelling.

Coupled with observed changes in magnetic fields in recent decades, the science behind this is quite reasoned.

[Lexinom]

I read through one of the PDFs. That’s a valuable resource. Thank you.

[DoughtyOne]

I browsed one and it seemed to have some good study guides, for lack of a better term.

[DoughtyOne]

Thank you. Glad you liked them too.

[Lexinom]

Steve Psaris is one of the younger creation scientists. In that same playlist there’s a clip called “Our Solar System: Evidence of Creation”. He goes through the sun and each of the nine (or eight + Pluto) planets - and all of their moons.

[DoughtyOne]

Does he focus on the magnetic fields also, or does he have a different slant on things?

[Lexinom]

He mentions those, yes - esp. Dr. Humphrey's correct prediction of the fields of Uranus and Neptune before Voyager flew by and measured them. He used water (from 2 Peter) as the starting point. All the NASA physicists told him he'd be off by six orders of magitude (100,000 times) but he we spot-on.

Lots is covered there, though, beyond magnetism.

[woofie]

truly frightening...the woman needs to take up mud wrestling or some other useful hobby

[DoughtyOne]

Good. I want to see overlapping theories that buttress each other.

Actually, it was NASA’s physicists that wound up being off by six orders of magnitude, from what they stated in the other videos.

Gotta love it.

[Lexinom]

I did a search on creation science gifts and here's what comes up:

http://www.zazzle.com/creation+science+gifts

http://www.cafepress.com/+creation-science+gifts

It is a strange time in which we live, in which down is up, left is right......