Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: entropy12
Why don’t we just accept the actual fact that both Reagan and Bush rarely vetoed any spending bills? My respect for Reagan would be 100 times greater if he had vetoed many more spending bills, and then let the Rats override his vetoes.

I'll let you in on a little secret.

That same Reagan who you say didn't exercise his veto enough, was able to get major tax cuts through and destroy the Soviet Union by massively building up the Military and without firing a shot and at the same time, decrease the overall size of several of the large government agencies.

He did this all while not having a Republican Led Congress.
46 posted on 11/08/2014 2:21:20 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie; entropy12

Oh, and those large budgets he had, in large part were a result of the horse-trading he had to do with a Democrat led congress in order to build up the military at the same time.

The Tea-Party is completely proud of President Reagan’s record.


47 posted on 11/08/2014 2:22:48 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

Sum total of tax cuts + Increased spending = Tripling of net spending. Flunks my test of a fiscal conservative on every count. Like I said, TEA Party would not be proud.


48 posted on 11/08/2014 2:24:06 PM PST by entropy12 (When you abstain from voting you help a democrat get elected, and promote liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson