To: mdittmar
I’ve been thinking Cruz/Walker...but Walker/Cruz would work too.
4 posted on
11/05/2014 11:04:43 AM PST by
Cowboy Bob
(They are called "Liberals" because the word "parasite" was already taken.)
To: Cowboy Bob
I want Cruz as Majority Leader, we’ll need him there to keep the POTUS in line.
I think Susana Martinez would be an excellent VP choice.
8 posted on
11/05/2014 11:06:57 AM PST by
dfwgator
(The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
To: Cowboy Bob
Walker/Cruz preferable. Walker seems the more thoughtful and deliberate in manner and utterance.
16 posted on
11/05/2014 11:18:40 AM PST by
Elsiejay
To: Cowboy Bob
walker/cruz is better. he has almost all his experience as a successful executive officer. senators historically are terrible executives. it’d be better for cruz to be #2 to a great executive to learn how it’s done right.
24 posted on
11/05/2014 11:26:19 AM PST by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Cowboy Bob
I’ve been thinking Cruz/Walker...but Walker/Cruz would work too. Yep.
But, I would hate to lose Cruz in the Senate unless he is president.
25 posted on
11/05/2014 11:27:11 AM PST by
Skooz
(Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
To: Cowboy Bob
Cruz is a better speaker, but Walker has executive experience. I would be happy with either.
37 posted on
11/05/2014 12:10:23 PM PST by
Hugin
("Do yourself a favor--first thing, get a firearm!",)
To: Cowboy Bob
Walker/Cruz would be my pick I think. Primarily because of Walker’s tenacity in getting reelected. Have you listened to Walker’s acceptance speech? So Excellent!
This would set up Cruz as the Veep incumbent, 8 years later too.
(I can dream, can’t I?)
:)
50 posted on
11/05/2014 4:53:21 PM PST by
prairiebreeze
(Don't be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson