Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oh, by the way… those airport screenings probably don’t work anyway
Hot Air.com ^ | November 1, 2014 | JAZZ SHAW

Posted on 11/01/2014 1:48:08 PM PDT by Kaslin

Ed mentioned earlier today that Canada will be joining the group of nations instituting travel bans and/or quarantines from Ebola afflicted nations, while the United States will stick with the airport screening route. But don’t worry… I’m sure that will work out just fine.

These scientific studies show that airport Ebola screenings are largely ineffective

Those travelers now have to submit to temperature checks and questioning. But scientific studies published by the National Institutes of Health have shown that similar protocols were largely ineffective during an outbreak of Swine Flu in 2009, as Government Executive pointed out in an article last week.

A study of screenings at Australia’s Sydney Airport during the Swine Flu pandemic found that fever was detected in 5,845 passengers during the roughly two-month period covered by the analysis. Only three of those individuals ended up having the virus, which is known in the scientific community as H1N1.

Researchers determined that 45 patients who acquired the illness overseas would have “probably passed through the airport” during the roughly two-month period covered in the study. That means the screeners likely missed the vast majority of individuals who arrived at the facility with Swine Flu, despite grabbing thousands of travelers who showed signs of fever.

I’m sure we’re all feeling so much more confident now. Particularly when you consider that there may or may not be two more people in Oregon on the list. Was anyone monitoring them when they arrived at the airport? If so, did they just miss it because their 21 day period was not yet up and they felt just fine, like the famous bicycling nurse in Maine?

It’s comforting to be told that people aren’t contagious when asymptomatic. Of course, at the same time, most of these current Ebola patients can still not tell us where or when they contracted the virus. When you put those two factors together, it seems as if a rational person might think it prudent to limit exposures in general until such things were more definitively nailed down. Those would be the rational people in Canada and Australia, just to name a couple.

But such considerations can carry over to the personal level as well. We keep discussing the hero status of those who travel to Africa to battle this disease and I certainly won’t deny it. But upon their return, I would guess that people with such altruistic souls might think to put up with a couple more weeks of inconvenience just to stay on the safe side for the greater good. You know… like that Doctor in California. He returned from Liberia and was volunteering to lock himself up in his house before anyone from the government even had a chance to debate the matter. (The guy even sent his dog away to live with relatives until he had a clean bill of health.) He continues to feel fine with not a single symptom, but he’s not leaving his house. During an interview on CNN this morning (via Skype) he said it was worth it even if all he accomplished was to “not scare the neighbors.”

That’s seems just a tad more altruistic than hiring a lawyer and heading out for some buffalo wings, doesn’t it?


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: airportscreening; ebola; ebolaairline

1 posted on 11/01/2014 1:48:08 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

2 posted on 11/01/2014 2:00:02 PM PDT by SandRat (<Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s not about security.
It was never about security.

It’s about training people to follow orders and submit to government control in all aspects of their lives.


3 posted on 11/01/2014 2:11:22 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Democrats have a lynch mob mentality. They always have.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

4 posted on 11/01/2014 2:52:43 PM PDT by clearcarbon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

But we want you to believe it so the program can continue


5 posted on 11/01/2014 3:18:42 PM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

But they work very well for obola’s plans.


6 posted on 11/01/2014 3:36:02 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clearcarbon

It’s spelled “quarantine.”


7 posted on 11/01/2014 5:03:53 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndreconmarine; Fitzcarraldo; Covenantor; Mother Abigail; EBH; Dog Gone; ...
Ping...

A link to this thread has been posted on the Ebola Surveillance Thread

8 posted on 11/01/2014 11:49:44 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Of course airport screenings don’t work. The idea was silly from the start.

Thomas Duncan arrived in this country symptom-free.

It’s likely that one traveling to the US after being exposed in Africa would arrive during the incubation period and be symptomatic only after assimilating into the population.

On the other hand, airport screening could identify a passenger with fever, returning from Africa and admitting Ebola exposure, and turn her loose after catching hell for trying to quarantine her.

Lunacy abounds.


9 posted on 11/02/2014 6:03:38 AM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; neverdem; ProtectOurFreedom; Mother Abigail; EBH; vetvetdoug; Smokin' Joe; Global2010; ...
If a quarantine saves just one child's life, it's worth it.


Bring out your dead! The Dark Man cometh! Bring out your dead! The Dark Man cometh! Bring out your......

(Since all records of obama's past were lost in a tragic boating accident and fire, no one can be certain that the guy in the red circle isn't him...)

Post to me or FReep mail to be on/off the Bring Out Your Dead ping list.

The purpose of the “Bring Out Your Dead” ping list (formerly the “Ebola” ping list) is very early warning of emerging pandemics, as such it has a high false positive rate.

So far the false positive rate is 100%.

At some point we may well have a high mortality pandemic, and likely as not the “Bring Out Your Dead” threads will miss the beginning entirely.

*sigh* Such is life, and death...

10 posted on 11/02/2014 7:02:07 AM PST by null and void (If a quarantine saves just one child's life, it's worth it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Thanks for the ping!


11 posted on 11/02/2014 8:24:46 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson