Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: George from New England

I tend to agree with you. I repeat....stable is not a condition according to the “rule book”.


11 posted on 11/01/2014 9:19:42 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau

hubby is an MD and says not to read anything into these “condition” reports as there really are no set and universal standards as to what defines someone as critical or serious. Docs can and do decide these conditions in a sometimes arbitrary way.

Stable is usually used to describe vital signs.


17 posted on 11/01/2014 9:37:50 AM PDT by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson