Democrat cities will soon be offering blacks free homes, cash bonuses, tax rebates and other incentives to entice them to move to their ghettos.
Liberal cities have to keep a certain percentage of blacks in the population to maintain their liberal credentials and be accepted as equals by other liberals.
Imagine how embarrassing it would be for a liberal from a city with a shortage of blacks to face liberals from another city with an abundance of blacks.
It could damage their self esteem not to mention their standing in the liberal community.
Simple. They don't meet.
No more than liberals from cities with a shortage of working class whites meet liberals from cities with an abundance of working class whites. It's two different worlds. Maybe two different kinds of liberals.
So, no, San Francisco isn't going to try to entice working class or poor African-Americans any more than Ithaca or Madison does.
This is what sanctuary cities are already offering illegals (and have been paying blacks for decades); without those freebies the cities would be ghost towns and all of the government workers would be unemployed.
It was no accident that some of the “unaccompanied minors” along the border were housed in a vacant school; they are being trafficked here by our government to use that very school (and fill the nearby housing).
Blacks have been displaced in their urban hatcheries since welfare reform stopped paying them to have multiple children; one “golden ticket” welfare bastard now qualifies them for the freebies, so their birthrate fell sharply. The Hispanics that were projected to pass them in population by 2010 had already done so by 2000.