Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nervous Tick

I can understand going profitless to get things started and grab market share, especially on the internet where there are massive network effects, but Amazon has been around for 20 years.


10 posted on 10/23/2014 11:46:05 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

>> Amazon has been around for 20 years

Yeah, I can remember shorting them in the dot-com bubble time. Hard to believe that was that long ago. I thought they were goners back then. Guess I’m too old-fashioned to understand “profitless prosperity”.


15 posted on 10/23/2014 11:50:19 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed is his demon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

A stockholder would care about profits, possibly — or they might not, if the stock value increases anyway.

A business doesn’t have to make any profits to be viable. You can operate a family business that makes no money, but pays your salary. You don’t need a profit.

At some point you would expect stockholders to balk, and then the stock price will drop and the stockholders will be upset.

But “profitless prosperity” is not a mythical thing. It just isn’t the “norm” for a publicly held corporation.


29 posted on 10/23/2014 12:12:53 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson