Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kaehurowing; BuckeyeTexan
I don’t think this is a Rule 11 situation.

It's not, until the Supreme Court rules. (A denial of cert. ends the case as far as the parties to that particular appeal are concerned, but sets no precedent for other cases.) The Arizona AG is just looking for an excuse not to continue to press the issue.

15 posted on 10/21/2014 8:20:00 AM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; Salvation; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

16 posted on 10/21/2014 8:46:33 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian

The AG in most states also has a legal obligation to defend the State’s laws until there is a clear declaration by the highest court that it is unconstitutional/unlawful. But when the AG doesn’t want to uphold the law (think California as another example) the administration and AG just roll over and play dead.


18 posted on 10/21/2014 3:23:44 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson