Unless you are willing to eat s**t, you are not for food equality.
I can’t see the kind of people that support homosexual marriage as being against polygamy, and for regular Americans, it’s hard to see the type of person that would support polygamy, being against gay marriage.
To be intellectually honest, we have to agree that “marriage equality” which limits marriage to 2 people, does not allow “equality” for those who wish to live in polygamy or group marriage.
The term “marriage equality” adopted by those pushing homosexual marriage, is a misnomer.
And if you are in favor of homosexual marriage, on what grounds can you oppose polygamy? We have been told that homosexuals want to be married and have legal status, and that consenting adults should be able to live their lives as they see fit, and have legal status for that.
The same legal arguments for homosexual marriage can be used for polygamy or group marriage.
And if anyone favors homosexual marriage but opposes polygamy, such people should be called out as being bigoted and hateful and all that against the polygamous community. It is as discriminatory to limit marriage to two people as it is to limit it to people of opposite sexes.
It’s pretty obvious — marriage is either the traditional union of 1 man and 1 union or else it’s Anything Goes. You can’t add in a few new options and then just say “That’s it! We’re done! No more redefinitions!” Nope. Polygamy is a sure thing. The courts have absolutely no grounds on which to deny it.
We have a bunch of idiots running every institution on the planet.
The only goal is to make marriage meaningless.
“Personally, I don’t have any misgivings about same-sex marriage, mostly because I don’t believe that it destabilizes society or family”
Sure it doesn’t until you refuse to be part of it, then
you are sued and forced to accept it by the courts. Like
bakers who refuse to bake gay cakes or assembly hall
owners who refuse to allow gay weddings on their own
private property.
Harsanyi says this just to keep the homos off his a$$. He
cant be that ignorant or can he?
I’ve said this before.
Once you allow the one to be legal, you cannot win a legal argument against the other.
If two men can get married, how would you ever argue against 3 men getting married?
Bttt
Anybody warped enough to be OK with homosexual “marriage” is probably ok with any other perversion of marriage as well.
This is a natural progression based on the undefining of marriage. The homosexual activists think they redefined marriage(or they don’t really care what happens next), but they have been successful in undefining marriage. It will be whatever you want it to be.
Coming soon...
Unless you’re for incest, you’re not for marriage equality.
Unless you’re for child brides, you’re not for marriage equality.
Unless you’re for pedophilia, you’re not for marriage equality.
If it is supposedly unconstitutional to prohibit homosexual marriage, then there is no way you can justify prohibiting polygamy or polyandry or group marriage or even incestuous marriage or prostitution (rent a marriage).
As long as one or more people “love each other”....
Frankly polygamy is historically a normal human condition. Homosexual marriage, however, is an abomination against both God and Nature.
Or incest. .
Multiple wives cause multiple mother-in-law syndrome.
Next pervert lawsuit.
http://www.tlc.com/tv-shows/my-five-wives/videos/meet-the-williams-family.htm my 5 wives on your cable tv, it was bad enough Disney is running Taylor has 2 mommies. No responsible parent should allow their children to watch Disney Channel.