Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Source: Australian Department of Defence

1 posted on 10/15/2014 6:04:05 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: sukhoi-30mki

Same problem with the Harrier. Loiter time was minimal because the vertical take off gear was heavy and bulky. Only way to resolve that problem (20 minute loiter time) would have been if they had made the fighter much bigger. Even then, the conventional version would still have had an advantage, assuming they shared more or less the same airframe.


2 posted on 10/15/2014 6:23:35 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

That ship does not look proportioned correctly. Rides high in the water and could turn turtle easily! Probably just me.


3 posted on 10/15/2014 7:36:21 PM PDT by biff (WAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sukhoi-30mki

And yet for all of it’s inferiority, the Royal Navy has switched back to F-35Bs, because it was going to be too expensive to convert their carrier to CATOBAR.

Likewise, if Australia wants to use their LHD as a carrier, their only choice is the F-35B.


4 posted on 10/16/2014 3:23:46 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson