[precisionshootist]

"People who work in close proximity to an infected person are at greater risk. That doesn’t invalidate the general rule. At the moment the hot zone is limited to a few hospitals. And we’re better equipped to contain it than in Africa. Panic is unwarranted."

While I agree panic is unwarranted what is very warranted is the SHUTTING DOWN OF OUR BORDERS IMMEDIATELY!

What we learned today is that someone else has now tested positive for Ebola. What is NOT being said is what's important.

What is not being said is that it takes several days to test for Ebola. This was a health worker who worked with the first patient, someone who clearly would have been on notice to watch for symptoms. So this worker MUST Have been sick and clearly showing symptoms for several days YET WE HAVE HEARD NOTHING ABOUT IT UNTIL A TEST HAS SHOWN POSITIVE. In other words CDC officials have known and suspected this person had Ebola for several days but kept it under wraps.

We are being lied to by the CDC and the administration to protect at all costs the political agenda of the left. The left in our government do not care who dies as long as they are able to keep the borders open and ultimately take over our countries elections.

[Age of Reason]

"People who work in close proximity to an infected person are at greater risk. That doesn’t invalidate the general rule. At the moment the hot zone is limited to a few hospitals. And we’re better equipped to contain it than in Africa. Panic is unwarranted."

But will our approach be scalable?

Our current handling of the few suspected cases seems to work fairly well.

But what happens when flu season hits?

Will there be enough containment wards to hold all the people with symptoms?

Might real cases of ebola be sent home for lack of space, thinking those cases are people with the flu?