Replies

No kidding. Admittedly, Rush used to be reasonably conservative on social issues years ago, but I haven’t heard much evidence in a long while.

This past Monday, I heard most of his show on the car-radio as I was making a long drive, and it was amazing how pat, how diffident, how non-committal he sounded on the whole Supreme Court ruling. Not one negative word about homo-marriage that I heard, and he didn’t really sound all that concerned over the ‘judicial activism’ aspect of it, either. Although as I disclaimer, I did miss a bit of his show when I stopped for lunch.

But regarding what I heard, I was rather astounded at just how unconcerned and unanimated he seemed by the whole situation. It’s really sapped any interest or inclination I might have had in tuning him in again anytime soon.

Thanks for the thoughtful input on Rush Limbaugh, my hero with clay feet.

Rush is a great conservative, but terribly weak on social issues. His heart and soul are not into the worship of God, pro-traditional marriage or pro-life. He could risk a mere 3 or 4 percent of his giant audience to be a little more socially conservative. He got his start, as you may recall, by doing “caller abortions,” with a handheld vacuum cleaner to dispose of obnoxious liberals.

But instead his real passion on social is for attacking femi-nazis, on which he is brilliant. But can’t he put some of his passion to defending babies and male-female marriage?

You’re exactly right, he does not seem to care much about the threat of the radical gay agenda and the threat toward the rights of conservative Christians. He is compromised by the fact that he is on his fourth marriage and tends to marry bimbos who do not seem to be conservative, God-fearing Christian women.

In other words, the type of woman who wheedles her rich fiancé for permission to hire the most famous homosexual singer in the world at their wedding reception.