Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tzfat
Yes, of course Jesus kept the feasts. After all, He lived under the old covenant. The new covenant could not take effect without His death:

"And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance. For where there is a testament, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. For a testament is in force after men are dead, since it has no power at all while the testator lives." - Hebrews 9:15-17
7 posted on 10/08/2014 5:12:02 PM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: LearsFool

There was nothing wrong with the first covenant (other than our inability to keep our end of the bargain as it was meant to be). That said, this one’s a better deal.


8 posted on 10/08/2014 5:37:07 PM PDT by BipolarBob (I vacation in Sierra Leone and all I got was this lousy T-shirt and a case of ebola.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: LearsFool

So, you chose to NOT do what your master did, because you tradition has overturned the commandments of G-d. Read John 13-15 and tell me what kind of disciple that would make you.


18 posted on 10/09/2014 6:07:26 AM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson