Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: redreno
The comments attached to the television segment are a howl, all the "Easy A" high horse moral grandstanding. Of course the cops made an error, in good faith and based on a neighbor's error, but it was an error on the side of caution.

Running these kinds of no-brainer stories as "news" just discourages diligence among neighbors, not to mention foster Mom's nonsense about hurtfulness and her "boy" feeling loved, and all that BS.

At least they didn't kill him, and then the dog. People are way too ready to be offended, demanding of apologies.

You can't have affirmative action, deliberative actions meant to be "welcoming," and at the same time unconscious of race.

8 posted on 10/08/2014 8:20:57 AM PDT by Prospero (Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Prospero

During the year that the foster man (he is 18) had been with the family, one might ask whether the parents introduced him to the neighbors, or whether they included him in family pictures displayed the house.


20 posted on 10/08/2014 9:18:16 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson