Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney; Kennard; bestintxas; nuke rocketeer; crusty old prospector

It seems to me that this kind of tech should already be available to the drillers in some form or other. Am I wrong?


5 posted on 10/08/2014 7:49:17 AM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ckilmer

the absolute best measure for detection of shale gas is via mudlogs where gas will “kick” due to excessive pressure during drilling operations.

Almost every shale I know of produces these results.

Drillers always made record of where these kicks were as they drilled to more productive formations.

Don’t really see much benefit in this device except maybe liquids content estimation of shale formations; however, having said that, I also poo-pooed horizontal drilling technology as a novelty back in the early 80s, so I may not be the best one to ask.


8 posted on 10/08/2014 8:37:28 AM PDT by bestintxas (Every time a RINO bites the dust a founding father gets his wings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ckilmer

Outside of mudlogs - they can use a magnetic resonance tool to determine water/hydrocarbon contents, as well as a number of detectors with and without radioactive or sound sources to look at electromagnetic, density, and porosity responses. Sounds like this is more precise in typing the hydrocarbons.

And then of course there are core samples


10 posted on 10/08/2014 1:51:26 PM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson