Posted on 10/07/2014 7:01:04 PM PDT by Squawk 8888
Today, October 7, 2014, the Hon. Irwin Cotler issued the following statement:
For the last several weeks, Members of Parliament and the Canadians we represent have been seized with the genocidal incitement and mass atrocities committed by the violent extremist group known as ISIL. I know that my colleagues on both sides of the House have been horrified by ISILs brutality and depravity, and take seriously the question of how best to combat it.
The motion put forward by the Government in this regard recommends a combat mission as a central part of an international coalition response that I have been advocating for some time. Indeed, I have been a long-standing proponent together with my Liberal colleagues of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine, which states, simply put, that where there are war crimes, crimes against humanity, ethnic cleansing, or genocide, and the government of the region in question is unable or unwilling to take action or worse, is the author of the criminality the international community has a responsibility to intervene to protect targeted innocent civilians.
Admittedly, R2P is not limited to military action. Together with my colleagues in the Liberal Party, I have long proposed a series of non-military initiatives to come to the aid of civilians in Syria and Iraq, including enhanced humanitarian assistance, protection for victims of sexual violence, and criminal prosecution of the perpetrators of international crimes, including Syrian President Assad. Yet, when confronted by radical evil by the genocidal slaughter of innocents force may be required. Indeed, it is because of international inaction three years ago against Syrias criminal Assad regime that radical jihadists including ISIL have been able to take root, develop, and engage in a campaign of abhorrent brutality.
At the same time, the Governments motion lacks clarity about what the strategic nature and limits of Canadas mission will be. It mentions airstrike capability as only one element of a larger contribution of unnamed Canadian military assets; it does not specify where these assets will be deployed; and it has been less clear than warranted about the missions objectives, costs, command, and rules of engagement.
In particular and this is reason enough for me not to support the motion I am deeply disturbed by the Prime Ministers statement that Canada would require the approval of the criminal Assad regime to carry out operations in Syria. To allow the perpetrator of war crimes, crimes against humanity, ethnic cleansing, and genocide, to green-light Canadian intervention is to turn R2P on its head. Assad should be a criminal defendant, not a coalition partner.
Moreover, the Government has neither briefed nor consulted with the leaders of the opposition, nor has it shared more fulsome information about the mission that would have helped Parliamentarians to make an informed choice.
Accordingly, on principled grounds, I will abstain from voting on the motion regarding Canadas combat role in the fight against ISIL. As such, I am in my riding this evening to honour a longstanding commitment.
I have the greatest respect for my fellow Members of Parliament, including my colleagues in the Liberal Party of Canada and our leader Justin Trudeau, who are bringing their perspectives and experiences to bear on this critical issue. We all support the members of the Canadian armed forces who will participate in this mission, and we share the hope that those threatened by ISILs abhorrent crimes including the Yazidis, Christians, Kurds, Muslims, members of the Syrian opposition, and others whom I have met will yet achieve the security and freedom they yearn for and deserve.
Canada Ping!
He is horrified by the savagery of ISIS. He recognizes force is required to stop genocide. He hopes the non-muslim minorities will manage somehow to avoid being massacred, and he salutes the Canadian soldiers who will go to defend them. Therefor he will abstain.
meh
Half a loaf. The rest of the Liberal caucus was lock-step with Trudeau.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.