As long as these guys refuse to lift a finger to stop the daily slaughter of thousands of little boys and girls by the abortionists, the destruction of the natural family by the sodomites, and the securing of our borders, all their nice words ring completely hollow.
Not to mention that several points in this list betray a statist mindset, one that presumes government has a role that it was never intended to have. Phrases like “growing the economy” and “creating jobs” are the tip off.
I am no purist -- for all his flaws, and they are many, had Gingrich won the presidential primary in 2012, I'd have voted for him with hope for positive change. Like Dubya he'd probably have woefully disappointed me, but then again, I read his entire web site that was substantial in real vision and information. TomGuy is correct, however, when he notes in post #4 above that here, Gingrich is speaking in pretty general terms. Lots of platitudes, very little meat. UNLIKE his campaign page in 2012, I hasten to add.
I voted for Eternal Vigilance in 2012. I will vote third party again in 2016 if the Republican party does what I fully expect it to do, and manipulates the nomination of a Democrat Republican -- a member of the Republican party who is philosophically on board with the Democrats in assigning enforcement roles to government that are so wrong as health care, forced cooperation with open homosexuality, and on-demand subsidized abortion.
Whether they admit it or not, every person who voted for Romney voted FOR the same things the Democrats want, morally, socially, and fiscally.
The only thing that counts is what you vote FOR.