Posted on 09/30/2014 5:22:58 AM PDT by BulletBobCo
Excluding muzzies is NOT politically correct in todays world. Shame! (sarc).
Now just waiting for the media and the law suits to surface.
OK, Bob Owens, you stand on the firing line while next to you a bearded Muslim in a kufi cap is blasting away with his AK.
(Notice no mention of the muzzie shouting “Allahu Akbar!”)
Bob Owens, I hope you find yourself on the firing line & realize you’re the only “infidel” there.
Then you can preach your Constitutional absolutism to the rest of us “greasy Islamophobes”.
You could until 1964, then something changed. We are between a rock and a hard place, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the precedent for all of these unconstitutional restrictions on free association, because it was itself unconstitutional. No way out of this slippery slope now.
Exactly. I’m thinking of the couple who refused to bake a wedding cake for gays... business was closed and they owe $150K in fines and are harassed.
I like your style and I hope that comes with a side of BACON!!!!!!!!!!!!
She has at last 3 points in her favor. 1. The safety concern is legit - nobody can tell you which Muslim is going to have sudden Jihad-syndrome from just a non-violent jihad supporter. So, its prudent and reasonable under the circumstances including the threats to enact a protective measure until the threat is identified and neutralized.
2. If this ever gets in front of a normal jury with a good lawyer on her side she would be acquitted. People are in fear of Muslims now.
3. To justify her actions if sued she can open up the Muslim violence problem and use all that evidence in support of self-defense; then it comes down to a determination of reasonableness. And, the last thing Muslim’s want is to have their protective cover and lies removed publicly like that.
Ms. Morgan, if I was in Arkansas, I would be shooting there...
>> I hope that comes with a side of BACON!
Bacon’s good. I like bacon. Yes, we’ll have plenty of BACON at the range snack bar! Along with oyster shooters, jalapeno poppers, and peel-and-eat shellfish. :-)
The left actually turns this upside down, just like they do with all other powers of gov’t.
The First Amendment, as you say, is to prevent gov’t imposition on religion.
However, the left turns this upside down, using gov’t to prevent individuals from “discriminating” based on religion, while they inherently do so in favor of non-Judeo-Christian religions.
Big slobbery jumpy St Bernards.
My next store i have the bathroom will face Mecca and I might have a wanted poster of Mohammad at the front door.
If you try and fight me on this, you’re treading on MY first amendment rights!
Look for CAIR to whine to the media, complain to state and Federal officials, and file discrimination lawsuits.
Muslims are the real victims, ya know. [/s]
I agree. This is unconstitutional. But it’s the natural duty of peace loving people to defend innocent lives.
Muslims have destroyed our ideal of ‘all religions being equal’. That experiment has FAILED.
I agree with Morgan’s decision. A privately owned and operated business has the right to refuse service to anyone. Period.
Do you mean to say these non-Christians are getting a taste of “religion FROM freedom? Surely their friends the libtards will put a swift end to that!
“he First Amendment only applies to government — meaning that the government cannot infringe on our God-given right to free speech and freedom of religion.”
You are correct sir...
It won’t last long, and it probably won’t do anything. They have their own firing ranges at their own camps in this country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.