Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Orman can only win if he hides is political philosophy, his clear associations with Democrats, his support for Obama, his shady business dealings, and his lack of integrity. The weekend football games and Royals ride to the postseason all featured ads against Orman, the first to take a shot at him. Very few people in Kansas read the Washington Post, but they didn't do him any favors either.
1 posted on 09/29/2014 7:53:21 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: centurion316

The last I heard there was still a pending court case on whether the Democrats should have to comply with the law requiring that they name a substitute candidate. What happened with that?


2 posted on 09/29/2014 7:56:32 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

I really hope the campaign advisors for Roberts are using Orman’s comments in those TV ads you spoke about.

Orman sounds like an out and out lefty who’s trying really hard to conceal those leanings.

You almost don’t need to nail him over his Dem connections. You could hit him really hard over his lack of sincerity or ability to articulate exactly what he stands for.


4 posted on 09/29/2014 7:59:04 AM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

Orman: “Vote for me, I won’t tell you sh-t about what I believe or who I am. Trust me....”


5 posted on 09/29/2014 8:04:46 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (www.FireKarlRove.com NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

Orman has said he would caucus with whichever party has the majority after November’s midterm elections


Say WHAT!


9 posted on 09/29/2014 8:16:15 AM PDT by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316
Greenlight the Keystone XL pipeline?
Orman said he doesn’t have enough information to say yes or no.

What about gun control?
He said gun restrictions should be “strengthened” but would not specify whether he backs an assault-weapons ban.

And on the biggest question of all — Would he caucus with Democrats or Republicans?
Orman insists he’s not sure.

Are the people of Kansas really so stupid that they can't see through this phony?

He doesn't have enough information to decide on the Keystone pipeline? And he wants to be a U.S. Senator? Give me a (expletive deleted) break. He is simply lying about it and all the other key issues of his campaign. Why? Because he is a Democrat and has to lie. It both suits his purpose and is, as we all well know, actually genetic.

10 posted on 09/29/2014 8:17:27 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Remember Mississippi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

When asked by the pollster, the voter should reply, “Hmmm, not sure.”


12 posted on 09/29/2014 8:18:13 AM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

He needs a new tagline:

Orman - a representative of nothing for nobody!

Orman - uncertain leadership for uncertain times!

Orman - he’ll vote ‘present’ for you!


13 posted on 09/29/2014 8:28:37 AM PDT by posterchild (It takes a politician to declare a settled science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316
Well if he is not going to define himself, then why does'nt Pat Roberts define himself for him by running attack ads?

I just got back from Kansas, and did not see a whole bunch of ads. Roberts appears to be running a sad, mealy mouthed campaign.

OTOH, Ed Gillespie of VA just started running attack ads, tying his opponent to Obama; expect him to pick up points on Warner.

19 posted on 09/29/2014 8:47:06 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

What a Freaking Opportunist!!! He’ll caucus with whoever wins??? OMG...What a WHORE!


22 posted on 09/29/2014 9:19:19 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

“And on the biggest question of all — Would he caucus with Democrats or Republicans? — Orman insists he’s not sure”

I suspect Harry Reid and the DNC are at least pretty sure. If it was likely that Orman would caucus with the GOP, I doubt the Democratic candidate (Chad Taylor) would have stepped aside so willingly. Kansas is their best chance at thwarting a GOP majority in the Senate (or at least making the odds that much longer). Conceding it a guy they thought likely to join the Republicans just wouldn’t make a lot of sense.


26 posted on 09/29/2014 11:28:26 AM PDT by DemforBush (A Repo Man is always intense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson