Does that include not voting for Bhoner’s leadership? Because if you do, you back amnesty.
Bull manure.
Roberts is in the Senate.
Id be happy if Lynn Jenkins and Pompeo lost.
Those that fail to learn the lessons of history are condemned to forever repeat them.
We tried amnesty, with the promise from the Dims to secure the border. The Dims got their amnesty we didn’t get the border secured. Does anyone think it would be different this time?
Boehnor and McConnell say “It’s Not Amnesty!” and so will you say too Senator Roberts, and so will you.
And after you vote for Amnesty you will duck and dive, and when cornered you will shriek “But It’s Not Amnesty! It’s Not Amnesty!”. Yep.
Does he really think we are that stupid? But then I guess quite a few are. The nominal fine, even though it is followed by pages of exemptions, and exceptions, would “technically” penalize the law breakers, thereby making the immigration laws they have been pushing not amnesty. Amnesty means to forgive, and if we penalize them, it isn’t actually forgiveness. This is Clintonesque in its deceit. How about saying he will never support allowing people that broke our laws to remain in this country and become citizens.
Amnesty needs to be very clearly defined. I think when most candidates mention amnesty they mean that illegals can’t become citizens but they can stay (and continue to steal jobs and benefits).
Candidates need to be PUSHED for a very specific definition.
With everyone in Kansas watching the Royals - White Sox game, it didn’t take long for this thread to go off the rails. Quite the politically savvy group. /s
Does that include fighting for it, Patty?