Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GIdget2004

I think that would be a bad move on Wolf’s part.


7 posted on 09/26/2014 5:20:33 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SoFloFreeper
I think that would be a bad move on Wolf’s part.

I agree. There's no good reason to go nihilist. Orman brings nothing but the prospect of more disaster. At least Roberts has been somewhat conservative in his own, out of touch, doddering way. I'd support Wolf for a future run but not if he does this.

26 posted on 09/26/2014 6:39:21 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
I think that would be a bad move on Wolf’s part.

I kind of agree. I see a big issue with anti Robertson conservatives backing a guy who has stated he'll caucus with who ever has a "solid majority". Sounds to me like he's saying he's going to stick his finger in the air and side with whomever benefits him the most. If he's announced a winner, bottom dollar his vote goes up for sale about 10 seconds after.

32 posted on 09/26/2014 7:19:59 AM PDT by Turbo Pig (...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: SoFloFreeper
I think that would be a bad move on Wolf’s part.

Wouldn't be very wise on Orman's either. He needs Democrats, independents, and moderate Republicans. Wolf won't bring any of those.

34 posted on 09/26/2014 7:25:42 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson