Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
Demographic Winter is the direct result of the Sexual Revolution – which first became noticeable in the late 1960s, not coincidentally, about the time birth rates began to fall.

Au contraire. Birth rate dropped more from 1955 to 1965 (5.5 births per thousand), prior to the Sexual Revolution, than from 1965 to 1975 (4.5 births per thousand).

http://www.trinity.edu/mkearl/fam-kids.html

Drop in birth rates has been a continuing process since 1800. Here's a graphic.

http://lamarotte2.blogspot.com/2013/03/a-steady-drop-in-crude-birth-rate.html

No big change in the pattern can be seen in the 60s, coinciding with the sexual revolution, just a continuation of the drop, starting about 1955, that was a result of the end of the Baby Boom.

I agree in general with the author's POV, but wish he'd use accurate data to support his position, not just make stuff up.

19 posted on 09/22/2014 7:35:22 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins most of the battles. Reality wins ALL the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan
Prior to the late 19th century, woman would routinely have a large number of children to account for high childhood mortality rates. As childhood deaths declined, the need for more children did too. However, the rate should have stabilized in the early to mid 20th century, but has continued to drop.
34 posted on 09/22/2014 7:51:54 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson