“And Republicans on the receiving end are largely helpless to hit back, knowing a fight with the much-admired survivor is not one theyre likely to win. “
So drop out then, gutless RINOs.
Hint for Gabby.
Someone is point a gun at you, duck.
Your hubby should have told you that one.
Maybe mark kelley-giffords got one of her strings too tight.
The next DWS?
....as usual.
He had threatened her before. I knew. I just knew, Vicki says. A narrator then declares that McSally opposes making it harder for stalkers to get a gun.
...
Enraged stalkers would never dream of using a knife, car, or blunt object.
Ann Coulter vindicated.
Remember who her best gal pal was when she was in the House ... Debbie Dipsh!t! She hasn’t changed, just a little slower on the drawl!
James Brady. Gabby Giffords. Ain’t it funny how two of the most prominent anti-gunners are provably profoundly brain-damaged? Makes you wonder about the rest of them.
The harlot Giffords was a mean one before she got shot; imperious and contemptuous of her constituants. I wonder if the stalking boyfriend would have been on the street if the court had been responsible? He could have stolen a car, obtsained any number of controlled and / or illegal substances, used a knife and the list goes on but Giffords brays on. Personally, I wish Laughner had been a better shot or used a bigger gun.
I won’t say what I’m thinking.
Damn it’s hard not to, but I won’t.......
HOLLOW POINTS....GRRR.....
Not a surprise. The whole business was one big lie—the press and a lying sheriff pretending that a crazy leftist was set on her by a passing remark by Sarah Palin.
And she has gone along with the whole propaganda campaign.
I am ‘sorry’ she got shot etc
BUT they could march her around the country like an extra from “Weekend at Bernies” and keep propping her up etc and if they decided to run her for pResident, the dummies would fall all over themselves to vote for her.
All knew what a ‘witch’ Hillary could be/was and when Lazio walked across the stage one would think he punched her out.
Actually, in a one on one I am not so sure she wouldn’t take him out.
“And Republicans on the receiving end are largely helpless to hit back, knowing a fight with the much-admired survivor is not one theyre likely to win.”
If this is true, that Repub’s can’t handle this fight, I am shocked at their lack of political knowledge. This is textbook, politics 101, you simply come back with an ad that features an elderly person, a woman, or a teenager, who saved their life or the life of a family member because they were able to defend themself against a bigger, nasty criminal by having access to a gun. Especially, if you have a woman who defended herself against a mean ex-boyfriend. That is just the message to counter the attack. It is simple, it is politics 101.
If you can’t handle these kinds of attacks, then you can’t run a political campaign in 2014. We are in an era when the Stalinist left feels it has an open road to all their desires. They have taken the strategy of running official victims (race, affliction, point of view) for office because they assume those official victims cannot be criticized in a campaign. Any opponent must simply ignore that strategy or the opponent will defeat him or herself.
It’s very easy to hit back against ads like the first one mentioned, find a person with an alternative story and tell it.
PUNCH BACK TWICE AS HARD.
We all knew her husband was a sanctimonious b*tch, too bad she is too.
Claim: Mark Kelly purchased an AR-15 rifle the day after testifying to Colorado legislators about the need for additional gun control measures.
TRUE
Read more at snopes.com
They can rationalize all they want, but even lefty-slurpees like Snopes know the truth about Mr. and Mrs. Gabby: “Firearms for me, but not for thee.”
Ad hominem tu quoque? (literally: “You also”) refers to a claim that the source making the argument has spoken or acted in a way inconsistent with the argument.
Who cares?
Their actions show them to be phonies, like algore, his 52” inseam lifestyle and glowbull warming.
Hands off the Bill of Rights!
Good old Gabby was shot a public meting she had scheduled to kick off her charm offensive to repair the damage, anger and wrath she incurred with voters in her hyper partisan support in ramming Obama and the Democrats radical agenda down the throats of Arizona voters.
She and hubby needs to shut up and go away but fat chance of that when they are living off the donations of her Gun Control PAC.
Shes extremely smart, and shes going to do what it takes to push her policy agenda.
Seriously, how much of Gabby Giffords is actually left?
Oh bull. Giffords isn’t all there. Her utilitarian husband and “party” are manipulating her. She is little more than a script reader now.
I feel pity for her and contempt for those using her as a tool for their hateful anti-Constitution agenda.
Let’s not forget why mass killings of the most innocent people occur. The losers who do this are committing suicide in most cases but they are trying to hurt the world as much as possible, regardless of their goal. They want to cause as much hurt as possible and to do so they seek out victims whose harm will cause the most grief and suffering. It is what they do—seek maximum emotional harm. As a society, the defense is to protect our most innocent and vulnerable. It is essential to defend our children to the utmost. It is a form of terrorism—the goal is to cause you as much emotional hurt and harm as possible. Protect the children, protect the schools, protect the vulnerable. Evildoers steer clear of a defended place where they might be harmed or limited in causing the most damage possible.